Flour Selection System Margin Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for selecting between heat treated and non-heat treated flour are inefficient in determining the optimal choice for maximizing business profit, as they do not accurately account for the cost differentials and absorption changes caused by heat treatment, leading to suboptimal recipe adjustments and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A microprocessor-based system that calculates the customer margin differential (CMD) or customer margin to decide treatment (CMTD) by determining the cost differentials and absorption changes between heat treated and non-heat treated flour, providing indications for selecting the appropriate type of flour based on positive or negative margins and threshold values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If heat treated flour is used, then water absorption capacity is improved, but recipe complexity and processing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater absorption capacityVSAvoidrecipe complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying heat treatment parameters (temperature, time, moisture content) to optimize flour's water absorption capacity. The method establishes specific parameter ranges and relationships that predict absorption behavior, allowing recipe optimization without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex empirical recipe development with a predictive mathematical model that calculates water absorption based on heat treatment parameters. This substitution of mechanical trial-and-error with computational prediction reduces recipe complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Quantity of substance

If heat treatment is applied to flour, then water absorption increases, but processing time and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater absorptionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating the required heat treatment parameters before actual processing using the predictive model. This allows optimization of treatment time and temperature in advance, reducing actual processing time while achieving desired absorption levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal predictive model that can determine optimal heat treatment parameters for various flour types and desired absorption levels. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate empirical studies for each scenario, reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If heat treatment parameters are optimized for maximum absorption, then flour utilization efficiency improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflour utilization efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically explores parameter changes to identify optimal heat treatment conditions that achieve desired absorption levels with minimum energy input. The model evaluates multiple parameter combinations to find the energy-efficient optimum rather than simply maximizing absorption without constraint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by determining the minimum necessary heat treatment parameters required to achieve the target water absorption capacity. Rather than applying excessive heat treatment, the model calculates the precise parameters needed, reducing energy consumption while maintaining flour utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively determines the optimal choice between heat treated and non-heat treated flour, reducing costs and optimizing margins by accurately predicting absorption changes and adjusting recipes, thereby enhancing profitability for suppliers and customers.

Implementation Method 1

Heat treated flour can absorb more water after heat treatment than it can before being heat treated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heating

Implementation Method 2

the capacity of flour to absorb water can be modified by denaturing the proteins and modifying the starch of the flour. Such a modification can be achieved by heating the flour at elevated temperatures for some length of time

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDenaturation:

Data Source

PatentUS8527290B2Systems and methods for selecting flour
Publication Date: 2013.09.03 RICH PRODUCTS CORPORATION
  • US8527290B2 patent drawing
  • US8527290B2 patent drawing
  • US8527290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Flour may be treated to denature the proteins and modify starches. The invention includes methods and systems for determining whether to use treated flour or untreated flour. The invention also includes methods and systems for determining whether to treat flour or not.