Flow Cell Battery Tank Layout for Stable Power With Lower Flow Energy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flow cell batteries face efficiency limitations and high costs due to the decoupling of energy storage capacity and power generation capacity, leading to inefficient electrolyte usage and increased energy consumption for maintaining power output.

Innovation Solution

A flow cell battery design featuring a top, bottom, and intermediate electrolyte tank configuration with controllable fluid communication and gas connections, utilizing a flowing device to optimize electrolyte flow and reduce gas volume, allowing for efficient electrolyte utilization and reduced energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If electrolyte flow rate is increased to maintain constant power output when ionic concentration is low, then power output is maintained, but energy consumption increases and efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic flow rate adjustment based on real-time monitoring of ionic concentration and power output requirements. The system transitions from static to dynamic operation, continuously adapting electrolyte flow rates to match actual reaction conditions, thereby optimizing energy efficiency while maintaining required power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor ionic concentration, power output, and flow rate parameters. This feedback enables closed-loop control where the system automatically adjusts electrolyte circulation to maintain optimal efficiency, preventing energy waste from excessive flow rates while ensuring sufficient power delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Power

If electrolyte flow rate is increased to maintain constant power output, then power output is maintained, but system efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts electrolyte flow rates based on real-time system conditions including ionic concentration and power demands. This dynamic adaptation prevents inefficient operation modes and maintains optimal productivity by matching flow rates precisely to reaction requirements rather than using fixed high flow rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Through continuous monitoring and feedback control, the system optimizes the balance between power output and efficiency. The feedback mechanism ensures that flow rate increases only occur when necessary for maintaining power output, thereby preserving overall system efficiency while meeting power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Quantity of substance

If ionic concentration of reactants is low, then fewer ions are available for reaction, but increasing flow rate to compensate increases energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveionic concentrationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously - adjusting flow rate, monitoring ionic concentration, and modifying power output targets - rather than relying on a single parameter adjustment. This multi-parameter optimization allows the system to maintain power output with minimal energy consumption even when ionic concentration varies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback system monitors ionic concentration levels and automatically adjusts flow rate and power output parameters accordingly. When ionic concentration is low, the system intelligently determines the minimal flow rate increase needed to maintain power output, avoiding excessive energy consumption that would result from blanket flow rate increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances efficiency by ensuring 100% utilization of electrolytes, reducing energy requirements for electrolyte flow, and maintaining stable power output, thereby improving the overall performance and cost-effectiveness of flow cell batteries.

Implementation Method 1

a flowing device for controlling a flow of electrolyte between the at least one intermediate electrolyte tank and the top electrolyte tank through the cell stack to the bottom electrolyte tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

each of the top, bottom and at least one intermediate electrolyte tank comprise at least one gas connection for flowing gas in and out of each respective tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

Flow cell batteries are a rechargeable fuel cell and is unique from conventional batteries insomuch that the energy is stored in electrolytes and not in electrode materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 4

a cell stack to transform energy states

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Fuel Cell

Data Source

PatentUS20230411651A1A flow cell battery
Publication Date: 2023.12.21 BRYTE AS
  • US20230411651A1 patent drawing
  • US20230411651A1 patent drawing
  • US20230411651A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flow cell battery comprising on at least one side of a cell stack; a top electrolyte tank, a bottom electrolyte tank and at least one intermediate electrolyte tank arranged therebetween. The top electrolyte tank is in fluid communication with the bottom electrolyte tank through the cell stack. A first fluid communication is provided between the at least one intermediate electrolyte tank and the top electrolyte tank for flowing therebetween. A second fluid communication is provided between the at least one intermediate electrolyte tank and the bottom electrolyte tank for flowing therebetween. The second fluid communication comprises a controllable fluid flow restrictor. Each of the top, bottom and tanks comprise at least one gas connection for flowing gas in and out of each respective tank. A flowing device is provided for controlling a flow of electrolyte between the tanks.