Flow Bore Inserts With Polyurethane Coating for Erosion Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for bonding urethane layers to flow equipment are difficult and result in equipment needing replacement when damaged, leading to downtime and inefficiency, especially in erosive environments.

Innovation Solution

Erosion-resistant inserts with internal structures and polyurethane coatings are designed to fit within flow equipment, providing mechanical engagement and sealing features to secure and protect against erosion and corrosion, extending equipment life.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If urethane coating is applied to flow equipment using bonding methods, then erosion resistance is improved, but manufacturing complexity and difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerosion resistanceVSAvoidbonding process difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The flow equipment is divided into modular sections with removable urethane liners. Each liner can be independently installed and replaced without affecting the entire equipment structure. This segmentation simplifies the manufacturing process by allowing separate production of liners and equipment bodies, then assembling them through mechanical retention features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A retention system acts as an intermediary between the urethane liner and the flow equipment structure. This intermediary mechanism (comprising retention members, engagement features, and sealing elements) facilitates easy installation and removal of liners without requiring complex bonding processes, thus improving ease of manufacture while maintaining erosion resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If entire equipment is replaced when urethane layer is damaged, then erosion protection is maintained, but loss of time and productivity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerosion protectionVSAvoidequipment downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The urethane protective layer is segmented into removable liners that can be independently replaced. When a liner becomes damaged, only that specific liner needs to be removed and replaced, not the entire flow equipment. This dramatically reduces maintenance time and equipment downtime while maintaining continuous erosion protection through staggered replacement of multiple liners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design allows for easy discarding of worn urethane liners and recovery/reinstallation of serviceable components. The modular structure enables rapid removal of damaged liners and installation of new ones, minimizing equipment downtime. The retention system facilitates quick disassembly and reassembly, allowing maintenance teams to efficiently replace only the worn protective layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If urethane coating is applied to entire equipment, then complete coverage is achieved, but device complexity and installation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection coverageVSAvoidequipment structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective system is segmented into multiple removable liners rather than a single complex integrated coating. Each liner is a simple, standardized component that can be manufactured independently and installed in modular sections. This segmentation reduces device complexity by breaking down the protective system into manageable, interchangeable parts while maintaining complete coverage through proper arrangement of multiple liners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The inserts significantly reduce erosion and corrosion, extending the life of flow equipment and simplifying maintenance by allowing for individual component replacement rather than entire system replacement.

Implementation Method 1

an erosion or corrosion resistant coating disposed around the internal structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectErosion resistance: Erosion

Implementation Method 2

an erosion or corrosion resistant coating disposed around the internal structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCorrosion resistance: Crevice Corrosion

Implementation Method 3

The insert also has a section that forms a seal along one or more respective interfaces formed between the insert and a respective portion of a second insert

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSealing:

Implementation Method 4

The insert also has an end section that forms a dynamic seal with a moving component on flow equipment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDynamic sealing:

Data Source

PatentUS11680671B2Erosion-resistant inserts for flow equipment
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 FMC TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11680671B2 patent drawing
  • US11680671B2 patent drawing
  • US11680671B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for transporting corrosive or erosive fluids having a flow conduit or flow equipment with a flow bore. One or more inserts (50) are disposed within the flow bore of the flow conduit or flow equipment. The insert(s) (50) include an internal structure (52) and an erosion or corrosion resistant coating (54) disposed around the internal structure. The insert(s) (50) is/are disposed inside the flow bore and provide erosion and/or corrosion resistance.