Flow Control Device Integrating Check and Shut-Off Functions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing check valves lack the ability to conveniently restrict forward flow and often require additional components or installations, leading to increased labor, space, and cost when trying to control fluid flow directionally in pipeline systems.

Innovation Solution

A flow regulation device with a pivoting flapper and an adjustable limiting element, utilizing a non-metallic spring and rotatable spindle, allows for customizable flow control and integration of shut-off functionality within a single valve, reducing the need for separate components and installations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a check valve is used to maintain unidirectional fluid flow, then backflow prevention is achieved, but the ability to restrict forward flow is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackflow preventionVSAvoidforward flow restriction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a check valve function and a shut-off valve function into a single integrated device. The housing contains both a flapper mechanism for check valve operation and a plug with actuator for shut-off operation, allowing both backflow prevention and forward flow restriction in one component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated valve performs multiple functions: it acts as a check valve to prevent backflow through the flapper mechanism, and simultaneously serves as a shut-off valve through the plug and actuator mechanism, enabling both unidirectional flow control and complete flow restriction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a shut-off valve is installed in series with a check valve to restrict forward flow, then flow control capability is improved, but device complexity and installation requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control capabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two separate valve functions into one integrated housing. The check valve mechanism (flapper, seat, spring) and shut-off valve mechanism (plug, actuator, seal) share a common housing and internal chamber, reducing the total component count from two separate valves to one unified device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a shut-off valve is installed in series with a check valve, then flow control versatility is improved, but installation space and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control versatilityVSAvoidinstallation space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By integrating both valve functions into a single housing with a unified port structure, the patent reduces the installation space required from that needed for two separate valves with intervening piping to a single compact unit that occupies less pipeline space and requires fewer installation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Force

If a metal spring is used to bias the flapper to the closed configuration, then closing force is improved, but corrosion resistance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclosing forceVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a metal spring for the flapper biasing mechanism while using elastomeric seals and corrosion-resistant coatings on metal components. The combination of metal (for structural strength and spring force) and elastomer (for corrosion resistance and sealing) creates a composite material system that balances mechanical performance with environmental durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides cost-effective, space-efficient, and labor-saving fluid flow control by enabling adjustable forward flow restriction and eliminating the need for separate check and shut-off valves, while ensuring reliable sealing and durability in hostile environments.

Implementation Method 1

A non-metallic spring is positioned within the chamber and is configured to bias the flapper to the closed configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A rod extends within the chamber, and the flapper is pivotally attached to the rod

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotation:

Implementation Method 3

A limiting element is located within the chamber, and is adjustably positionable in relation to the flapper to limit the amount by which the flapper pivots

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint:

Data Source

PatentUS8128058B2Flow control device
Publication Date: 2012.03.06 NDS INC
  • US8128058B2 patent drawing
  • US8128058B2 patent drawing
  • US8128058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flow control device in which a flapper is continuously biased to the closed position by a leaf spring that may have a plurality of fingers. The same valve includes a shutoff mechanism allowing the user to adjust forward flow through the valve or shut it off entirely. The leaf spring is made to include polyoxymethylene.