Flow Control Insert Petal Sealing Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dispensing closures lack an efficient and cost-effective flow control mechanism that ensures product dispensing only through the intended orifice, while maintaining compatibility with standard retention features and providing a reliable seal.

Innovation Solution

A flow control insert with multiple petals formed in an open position, which are closed upon assembly into the dispensing closure, using a snap-fit or other retention means, ensuring product passage only through the orifice and not around the sides, and manufactured from plastics like PP, PE, or TPE via injection molding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a flow control insert with petals is used to ensure product dispensing only through the orifice, then sealing reliability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases due to complex petal formation and assembly requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into a single flow control insert component: the petal structure provides both flow control and sealing functions, while the retention features (beads, lugs) integrate retention and positioning functions. This merging eliminates the need for separate sealing elements and retention mechanisms, reducing overall manufacturing cost despite the complex petal geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The flow control insert is designed with universal retention features (beads, lugs, engagement features) that can accommodate different dispensing closure types. The same insert design can be used across multiple product lines and closure styles, reducing tooling costs and manufacturing complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the insert is designed with standard outer size to fit standard engagement features, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase to ensure proper fit and seal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with standard closuresVSAvoiddimensional tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs retention beads and lugs with specific geometric parameters (radius, height, positioning) that provide tolerance compensation. These features are designed with dimensional parameters that allow for normal manufacturing variations while maintaining proper engagement and sealing, enabling standard size compatibility without excessive precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the petals are completely closed to form a seal, then flow control reliability is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need for precise petal closure control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control reliabilityVSAvoidpetal closure mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The petal structure is designed to close automatically through self-service mechanisms: the petals are pre-formed in an open position during injection molding, and their elastic material properties cause them to close automatically when the insert is inserted into the dispensing closure and retained by the beads/lugs. No additional actuation mechanisms are required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The petals are formed from flexible plastic material that can be molded in an open position but naturally closes when constrained by the retention features. The material's flexibility allows the petals to deform and seal against the orifice without requiring complex mechanical closure mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Reliability

If the bead for snap-fitting is added to seal against the dispensing closure, then sealing reliability is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases due to additional molding features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidinsert structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retention bead is integrated directly into the flow control insert body as a molded feature, combining the retention function and sealing function into the same component structure. This eliminates the need for separate retention rings or sealing elements, reducing overall device complexity despite adding a feature to the insert.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3894333B1Flow control insert in combination with a dispensing closure
Publication Date: 2024.04.24 OBRIST CLOSURES SWITZERLAND GMBH
  • EP3894333B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3894333B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3894333B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A flow control insert (102) for a dispensing closure is provided. The insert has a plurality of dispensing slits ( that define petals. (120,122,124,126). The petals are formed in an open position and are closed upon assembly of the insert into a dispensing closure.