Proportional Flow Control Valve Pressure Relief Piston

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electromagnetic 2-way proportional flow control valves face challenges with high power demand and difficulty in precise control, especially at low flow rates due to high solenoid drive force requirements, leading to abrupt changes in fluid flow with small changes in actuating current.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a pressure detecting piston that reduces actuating forces by creating a fluid-conducting connection between the fluid inlet and a pressure detecting chamber, allowing fluid pressure to apply force in the direction of relief for the solenoid, thereby minimizing the overall pressure-effective surface and energy consumption, and enabling a more linear solenoid drive force characteristic.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a seat-type design with proportional solenoid is used, then the valve can control volume flow, but the power demand and solenoid size become relatively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower demandVSAvoidflow control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The valve is divided into two independent functional sections: a pilot section with a pilot valve and pilot solenoid for precise control, and a main section with a main valve for flow regulation. This segmentation allows the small-power pilot solenoid to control the larger main valve, reducing overall power demand while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pilot valve acts as an intermediary between the pilot solenoid and the main valve. The pilot solenoid controls the pilot valve, which in turn regulates the main valve opening. This intermediary mechanism amplifies the control effect, allowing a small solenoid to control a larger valve with high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the solenoid drive force is flattened to ease control, then the valve opening can be controlled more easily, but the solenoid drive force becomes relatively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve control easeVSAvoidsolenoid drive force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The control function is segmented between the pilot solenoid and main solenoid. The pilot solenoid provides precise control with low power consumption, while the main solenoid handles the heavier duty of opening the main valve. This segmentation avoids the need for a single high-power solenoid with flattened drive force characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a sliding piston design is used, then the valve structure is simpler, but the power demand and solenoid size are not minimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve structure complexityVSAvoidpower demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The valve is segmented into pilot and main sections with different piston designs. The pilot valve uses a simple sliding piston suitable for low-power operation, while the main valve uses a more complex but power-efficient design controlled by the pilot section. This segmentation achieves both structural simplicity where possible and power minimization where critical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design achieves precise volume flow control over a wide range with reduced energy demand and smaller solenoid size, ensuring a flat and almost 100% linear characteristic curve, allowing for accurate flow rate control even at low flow rates.

Implementation Method 1

a control piston, designed as a sliding piston, acts, subject to the action of the magnetic force of the proportional solenoid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 2

The fluid inlet is connected in a fluid-conducting manner to a pressure detecting chamber by a pressure detecting duct such that the fluid pressure prevailing in the pressure detecting chamber applies a force to the pressure detecting piston and the control piston in the direction of a relief of the actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9395013B2Flow control valve
Publication Date: 2016.07.19 HYDAC FLUITECHNIK GMBH
  • US9395013B2 patent drawing
  • US9395013B2 patent drawing
  • US9395013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromagnetic proportional 2-way flow control valve (1) has a valve housing (2) in which a control piston (3) is guided to be displaced axially. The control piston (3) actuates at least one fluid-conducting connection (4) between a fluid inlet (5) and an outflow opening (6). An armature (8) can be actuated by a proportional magnet and acts on the control piston (3). A pressure detecting piston (9) serves as the actuator part on the control piston (3). The fluid inlet (5) is connected in a fluid-conducting manner by a pressure detecting channel (11) to a pressure detecting chamber (12) such that the fluid pressure prevailing in the pressure detecting chamber (12) loads the pressure detecting piston (9) and the control piston (3) with a force (F) in the direction of relief of the armature.