Flow Cytometer Drop Delay Determination via Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flow cytometers face challenges in accurately determining the drop delay, leading to imprecise cell sorting and contamination due to variability in particle size and drift in cytometer components, requiring significant human intervention and calibration.

Innovation Solution

The method involves capturing images of the flow stream to identify disturbances at the break-off point, calculating the drop delay that produces the maximal amplitude of disturbance, and adjusting parameters such as electrical charge timing and flow rate using a processor-controlled system, reducing the need for manual input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual calibration and determination of drop delay is performed, then the system can operate with basic components, but the sorting precision deteriorates due to variability in particle size and drift in cytometer components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrop delay determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow cytometer system performs self-calibration by automatically determining drop delay through image processing of the flow stream. The processor analyzes disturbances at the break-off point to calculate drop delay without requiring manual intervention, enabling the system to adapt to component drift and particle size variability autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical calibration procedures with an automated optical measurement system. Instead of physically adjusting components based on operator experience, the system uses imaging sensors and computational algorithms to precisely determine drop delay, substituting mechanical adjustment with optical detection and digital processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If automated determination of drop delay is implemented, then sorting precision improves, but device complexity increases due to additional imaging and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell sorting precisionVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging system serves multiple functions: it captures flow stream images for drop delay determination, monitors flow conditions, and provides data for sorting decisions. The processor performs both image analysis for calibration and control functions, making the system multi-functional and reducing the need for separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary imaging system that bridges the gap between the physical flow stream and the digital control system. The images serve as an intermediate representation that allows the processor to accurately determine drop delay and adjust sorting parameters without direct mechanical interaction with the flow stream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If frequent calibration is performed to maintain precision, then sorting accuracy improves, but productivity decreases due to time loss from calibration procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting accuracyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated drop delay determination system enables continuous operation without interruption for calibration. The processor continuously monitors the flow stream and adjusts drop delay in real-time, eliminating the need to stop the flow cytometer for periodic calibration and maintaining both precision and productivity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where the processor continuously analyzes flow stream images, determines current drop delay, compares it to optimal values, and automatically adjusts parameters. This closed-loop control maintains sorting accuracy throughout operation without requiring manual recalibration, as the system self-corrects for drift and variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If manual intervention is required for calibration and operation, then device complexity remains low, but the predictability of particle detection deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictability of particle detectionVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The flow cytometer system performs self-calibration by automatically determining drop delay through image processing of the flow stream. The processor analyzes disturbances at the break-off point to calculate drop delay without requiring manual intervention, enabling the system to adapt to component drift and particle size variability autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the accuracy of cell sorting by automating the determination of drop delay, minimizing human intervention, and improving the predictability of particle detection and sorting, thereby reducing contamination and increasing the efficiency of flow cytometer operations.

Implementation Method 1

As particles of interest (e.g., cells) move through the interrogation point, light from the irradiation source (e.g., laser) is scattered.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

The light can also excite components in the cell stream that have fluorescent properties, such as fluorescent markers that have been added to the fluid sample and adhered to certain cells of interest.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Implementation Method 3

The flow cell hydrodynamically focuses the particles (e.g., cells) within the stream to pass through the center of an irradiation source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic focusing:

Implementation Method 4

In flow cytometers that sort cells by an electrostatic method, the desired cells are contained within an electrically charged droplet. To charge the droplet, the flow cell includes a charging element.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic charging: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentEP3519797B1Methods and systems for determining a drop delay of a flow stream in a flow cytometer
Publication Date: 2024.10.09 BECTON DICKINSON & CO
  • EP3519797B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

Methods and systems for determining a drop delay of a flow stream in a flow cytometer are provided. Aspects of the methods according to certain embodiments include capturing an image of the flow stream to obtain an imaged flow stream, identifying a disturbance at a break off point in the imaged flow stream and calculating the drop delay of the flow stream based on the identified disturbance. Systems for practicing the subject methods having an imaging sensor for capturing one or more images of the flow stream and a processor configured to identify a disturbance at a break off in the imaged flow stream and calculating the drop delay using the imaged flow stream are also provided. Non-transitory computer readable storage mediums are also described.