Flow Cytometry Analyte Data Classification via Regression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flow cytometry data classification methods are prone to human error, leading to incorrect classification of singlets and variability between users, which hinders reproducibility and accuracy, especially in distinguishing debris and multiplets.

Innovation Solution

An automated method using a computer-implemented process that applies a regression model to determine relationships between analyte features and a cluster criterion, generating a sparse set of features to classify data into clusters, employing algorithms like Gaussian mixture models, DBSCAN, BIRCH, or K-means clustering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual gating methods are used for classifying flow cytometry data, then users can visually inspect and classify data points, but human error leads to incorrect classification of singlets and variability between users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidreproducibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical gating process with an automated computational classification system. The system uses algorithms to automatically classify flow cytometry events into singlet and non-singlet clusters, eliminating human variability and error while improving both classification accuracy and reproducibility across different users and laboratories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The classification system performs self-service by automatically determining cluster criteria and classifying events without requiring manual user intervention. The system independently identifies singlet and non-singlet populations based on the learned cluster criteria, making the classification process autonomous and consistent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual gating is used to distinguish singlets from debris and multiplets, then classification can be performed, but it is time-consuming and prone to user variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification efficiencyVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-learning the cluster criteria from training data before actual classification. This pre-processing step establishes the decision boundaries for singlet and non-singlet classification, enabling rapid and accurate automated classification without manual gating during the actual analysis phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If automated classification algorithms are implemented, then reproducibility and accuracy improve, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereproducibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational layer that bridges the raw flow cytometry data and the final classification results. This intermediary system includes components for feature extraction, cluster criterion determination, and event classification, which collectively manage the complexity while providing reproducible and accurate results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If more features are used in classification, then accuracy improves, but the computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and utilizes multiple relevant features from flow cytometry data including forward scatter, side scatter, and fluorescence intensities across multiple channels. By extracting and analyzing these specific features, the system achieves high classification accuracy while managing computational complexity through focused feature selection rather than processing all possible data dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240377307A1Methods and systems for classifying analyte data into clusters
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 BECTON DICKINSON & CO
  • US20240377307A1 patent drawing
  • US20240377307A1 patent drawing
  • US20240377307A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented methods of classifying analyte data are provided. Methods of interest include applying a regression model to determine a relationship between an initial set of analyte features and a cluster criterion, generating a sparse set from at most a portion of the initial set of the analyte features based on the relationship, generating a classification model based on the sparse set, and applying the classification model to classify the analyte data into the clusters. Systems and non-transitory computer-readable storage media configured to carry out the subject methods are also provided.