Flow Divider Valve Relief Management for Fuel Transitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional flow divider valves in aerospace fuel systems face challenges in smoothly transitioning between flow splits, particularly at low flow conditions, leading to disturbances and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system incorporating an equalization bypass valve, pressure equalization solenoid, relief management valve, and un-equalized enrichment valve, which control flow between primary and secondary nozzles by managing pressure differentials and selectively opening or closing flow paths to minimize disturbances during transitions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional flow divider valves are used to control flow split between primary and secondary nozzles, then the system can maintain stable operation, but transitions between flow splits cause disturbances especially at low flow conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestable operationVSAvoidflow disturbances during transitions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

An equalization bypass valve (EBV) is introduced as an intermediary component that provides a bypass path for flow between primary and secondary conduits. This mediator allows gradual redistribution of flow during transitions, preventing sudden pressure changes and disturbances while maintaining stable operation. The EBV acts as a buffer that smooths the transition process between different flow split configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the opening degree of the equalization bypass valve based on real-time pressure differential measurements between primary and secondary conduits. This dynamic control allows the system to adapt its flow distribution characteristics during transitions, optimizing performance by varying the bypass flow rate according to the current operating state and minimizing disturbances at all transition stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of time

If the EBV opens quickly to transition between flow splits, then the transition time is reduced, but pressure disturbances increase during the transition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransition timeVSAvoidpressure disturbances
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

A pressure differential sensor continuously monitors the pressure difference between primary and secondary conduits and provides feedback to the control system. Based on this feedback, the control algorithm dynamically adjusts the EBV opening rate, increasing it when pressure differential is small and decreasing it when pressure differential is large. This closed-loop feedback control enables fast transitions while suppressing pressure disturbances through real-time adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the effective flow resistance parameters during transition by dynamically adjusting the EBV opening degree. By varying the bypass flow resistance in real-time according to pressure conditions, the system optimizes the transition profile to achieve rapid flow split changes without generating excessive pressure disturbances, effectively decoupling transition speed from disturbance magnitude.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If rate limiting is applied to control transition speed, then pressure disturbances are reduced, but the transition time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure disturbancesVSAvoidtransition time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic rate limiting where the maximum opening speed of the EBV is not fixed but varies according to real-time pressure differential measurements. When pressure differential is small, the EBV can open faster with less restrictive rate limiting. When pressure differential is large, the rate limiting is increased to suppress disturbances. This dynamic adjustment of rate limiting parameters eliminates the need to choose between fixed fast transition with high disturbances or fixed slow transition with low disturbances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If the RMV opens the secondary flow path to increase PDF flow, then the pressure differential management is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure differential managementVSAvoidvalve structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The relief management valve integrates multiple functions into a single component: it combines the secondary flow path valve with pressure differential sensing and control logic. By merging the pressure management function with the existing EBV control system, the patent avoids adding separate complex pressure regulation devices. The RMV utilizes the same control infrastructure and sensing mechanisms already present in the system, achieving enhanced pressure differential management while minimizing additional complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables faster and more controlled flow split transitions with reduced fuel flow disturbances, allowing for improved system performance by varying rate limiting based on pressure conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The RMV can be configured to increase flow through PDF conduit as the difference between PFA and PDF is increased. The RMV can be configured to reduce flow through PDF conduit when the difference between PFA and PDF is lower

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

A pressure equalization solenoid (PES) is connected to the EC to selectively connect at least one of a servo supply pressure (PFA) conduit or return pressure (PDF) conduit into fluid communication with the EC

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid communication control: Valve

Implementation Method 3

The EBV can include a piston that divides flow between the EC and the flow inlet conduit to apportion flow from the flow inlet conduit to the secondary conduit based on a pressure differential between a flow meter pressure at the flow inlet conduit and a pressure in the EC

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential flow control: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS11598267B2Flow divider valve with relief management valve
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • US11598267B2 patent drawing
  • US11598267B2 patent drawing
  • US11598267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a flow inlet conduit and a primary conduit that branches from the flow inlet conduit for delivering flow to a set of primary nozzles. An equalization bypass valve (EBV) connects between the flow inlet conduit and a secondary conduit for delivering flow to a set of secondary nozzles. The EBV is connected to an equalization conduit (EC) to apportion flow from the flow inlet conduit to the secondary conduit. A pressure equalization solenoid (PES) is connected to the EC to selectively connect at least one of a servo supply pressure (PFA) conduit or return pressure (PDF) conduit into fluid communication with the EC. A relief management valve (RMV) is connected in the PDF conduit.