Flow Entry Output Table for Network State Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In virtualized networks, maintaining a consistent view of the actualized and desired network states is challenging, leading to network churn and inefficiencies as flows at managed forwarding elements (MFEs) are modified by multiple controllers, causing failures and disconnects.

Innovation Solution

A method using a flow entry output table that maintains reconciled, extra, and missing sets of flow records to align the actualized network state with the desired state, with a computation engine generating flow entries based on user inputs and managing forwarding behaviors across MFEs, and utilizing finite state machines to process and update these records.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple controllers modify flows at MFEs independently, then network flexibility and adaptability improve, but network churn and inconsistency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork flexibilityVSAvoidnetwork consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where MFEs send notifications to controllers about flow changes, and controllers track desired vs. actualized network states. This feedback loop enables controllers to detect inconsistencies and coordinate flow modifications, resolving conflicts while maintaining network flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary state tracking mechanism that maintains separate desired and actualized network state representations. This intermediary layer mediates between multiple controllers and the MFEs, coordinating flow modifications and ensuring consistency without requiring direct controller collaboration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If flows are frequently cleared and re-installed during failures, then network adaptability to failures improves, but network churn and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and tracking the desired network state before failures occur. When failures happen, the system can quickly compare actualized state with the pre-established desired state and apply minimal corrections rather than complete re-installation, reducing churn.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Controllers continuously monitor the actualized network state through feedback from MFEs and compare it with the desired state. This enables intelligent failure detection and selective flow reinstallation only where necessary, rather than blanket clearing and reinstallation, thereby reducing processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If comprehensive flow tracking is implemented across all MFEs, then network state consistency improves, but memory requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network state tracking into separate desired and actualized state representations, and further divides flow records into reconciled, extra, and missing sets. This segmentation allows the system to track state consistency without managing a single monolithic complex data structure, reducing implementation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by maintaining state information at appropriate granularities - per-MFE level for actualized state tracking, and per-flow-type level for desired state computation. This localized tracking approach achieves comprehensive consistency monitoring while avoiding unnecessary global complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If detailed flow record storage is maintained, then debugging and inspection capabilities improve, but memory consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging capabilityVSAvoidmemory consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments flow records into three distinct sets: reconciled (matching flows), extra (flows only in actualized state), and missing (flows only in desired state). This segmentation enables selective storage and processing - only non-reconciled flows need detailed tracking for debugging, while reconciled flows can be stored more efficiently, reducing overall memory consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10511487B2Method and mechanism for efficiently managing flows
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 VMWARE INC
  • US10511487B2 patent drawing
  • US10511487B2 patent drawing
  • US10511487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments provide a novel method for installing flows of a desired network state in an actualized network state of a managed forwarding element. In some embodiments, the method maintains a flow output table based on flow events received from a computation engine for computing desired state, and from a set of managed forwarding elements on which the computed desired state is installed. The method of some embodiments then installs flows on the set of managed forwarding elements based on the flow output table.