Flow Grinding Surface Finishing for Non-Planar Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flow grinding processes face challenges with non-planar surfaces, leading to flow separation, cavitation, and undesirable material removal, which can damage the component and are complex to simulate mathematically.

Innovation Solution

The method involves rounding the blank at positions where the flow direction changes and attaching additional material at potential flow stalls to prevent cavitation, using a flowable carrier material with abrasive particles, such as water or highly viscous grease, to control the flow and prevent uncontrolled material removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If flow grinding is applied to non-planar surfaces, then surface finishing is achieved, but flow separation occurs causing cavitation and uncontrolled material removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finishing qualityVSAvoidcomponent integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies preliminary action by rounding edges and adding material before the flow grinding process to prevent flow separation and cavitation during machining. This preparatory modification of the blank's geometry ensures smooth flow transitions and prevents the harmful effects of flow separation that would otherwise cause uncontrolled material removal and damage to the component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If mathematical simulation is used to model hydroerosive grinding, then process understanding is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess understandingVSAvoidsimulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mathematical simulations with simple, practical geometric modifications (rounding edges and adding material) that can be easily implemented and adjusted. These straightforward measures provide sufficient process control without requiring complex computational models, thereby eliminating the trade-off between understanding and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If flowable carrier material with abrasive particles is used, then material removal capability is improved, but uncontrolled material removal and surface damage occur due to cavitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal efficiencyVSAvoidsurface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The method applies preliminary anti-action by modifying the blank geometry (rounding edges and adding material at critical locations) to prevent flow separation and cavitation before the flow grinding process begins. This preemptive geometric adjustment counteracts the potential harmful effects of cavitation, allowing the abrasive carrier material to remove material efficiently without causing uncontrolled damage or surface defects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach prevents damage to the component by controlling flow stalls and cavitation, allowing for precise surface processing without complex mathematical simulations, ensuring accurate geometry maintenance and surface quality.

Implementation Method 1

The abrasive particles contained in the flowable carrier material impact the surface of the component to be machined as they flow over, thereby erosive grinding the corresponding surface as the abrasive particles remove material from the component upon impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

the blank is rounded at positions where the flow direction of the flowable carrier material containing the abrasive particles changes during overflow, and at positions where flow separation occurs on the finished component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

it is prevented that when the surface is machined with the flowable carrier material containing the abrasive particles, uncontrolled material is removed by cavitation due to the flow separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Data Source

PatentEP3856459B1Method of surface finishing of a component by flow grinding
Publication Date: 2024.11.06 BASF SE
  • EP3856459B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3856459B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for surface processing of a component through flow grinding, comprising the following steps: (a) providing a blank (1), (b) overflowing of at least one surface of the blank (1) with a flowable carrier material containing grinding particles. At positions at which, during overflowing, the flow direction (25) of the flowable carrier material containing the grinding particles changes the blank (1) is rounded, and at positions at which a flow separation takes place on the finished machined component, additional material (5) is attached such that a flow separation is prevented at the start of the overflowing.