Flow Path Characterization Through Pressure-Volume Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing analysis devices face challenges in efficiently and reliably characterizing the properties of flow paths and elements within them, particularly due to complex configurations and the difficulty in remote operation, which can lead to assignment errors and increased susceptibility to errors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving changing the volume of fluid in the flow path to alter pressure, using available equipment like pumps and pressure sensors to determine pressure changes, allowing for the characterization of flow path properties based on these changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual verification of element arrangement is performed, then configuration accuracy can be confirmed, but operating effort and susceptibility to errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration verification accuracyVSAvoidoperating effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification by automatically detecting element arrangement and configuration through sensor data and fluid dynamics analysis, eliminating the need for manual verification while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual verification is replaced by an automated detection system using sensors, pressure measurements, and computational analysis to identify element arrangement and configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If tags like barcodes or RFID are used to label components, then component identification is enabled, but device complexity increases and clarity is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent identification capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The identification capability is extracted from physical tags and implemented through virtual identification using sensor data, pressure measurements, and computational analysis of fluid dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Physical tags are replaced by creating a virtual model or digital representation of component identification through sensor measurements and data analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If conventional manual configuration verification is used, then element arrangement can be checked, but remote operation becomes considerably more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelement arrangement verificationVSAvoidremote operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification and self-characterization automatically using embedded sensors and computational analysis, enabling remote operation without requiring user presence at the device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides automated feedback about element arrangement and configuration through sensor data and pressure measurements, enabling remote monitoring and verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of information

If multiple tags are used to distinguish components, then component differentiation is achieved, but clarity is further restricted and complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent differentiation capabilityVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Physical tagging systems are replaced by automated detection using sensor measurements, pressure analysis, and computational differentiation of component characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and reliable characterization of flow path properties without manual intervention, facilitating remote operation and reducing errors, while utilizing existing device components.

Implementation Method 1

changing the volume of a fluid (e.g., water) in the flow path, in particular in the element of the flow path, in order to change the pressure in the flow path (e.g., by compressing or changing the temperature)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

determining the pressure change (e.g., by means of a pressure sensor and/or based on the adjusted pressure) in the flow path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS20250244301A1Characterizing a property of a flow path of an analysis device
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250244301A1 patent drawing
  • US20250244301A1 patent drawing
  • US20250244301A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for characterizing a property of a flow path, in particular of an element in the flow path, in an analysis device, the volume of a fluid in the flow path, in particular in the element of the flow path, is changed in order to change the pressure in the flow path. The pressure change in the flow path as a consequence of the volume change is determined. The property of the flow path is characterized based on the determined pressure change and/or the volume change.