Flow Path Switching Valve Bypass Mechanism Hysteresis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flow path switching valves exhibit hysteresis due to the elastic deformation of the membrane, leading to pressure loss and increased response time in pressure control circuits, which is affected by material tolerances and wear over time.

Innovation Solution

The inner peripheral wall of the valve chamber is designed with a bypass mechanism that cancels the sealing contact of the diaphragm in part of its circumference when the valve piston reaches the first end position, eliminating hysteresis without affecting the valve's basic function and increasing the flow cross-section.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the membrane maintains sealing contact with the peripheral wall to enable valve function, then the valve can switch flow paths, but hysteresis occurs due to pressure loss when air flows past the membrane

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve functionVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing contact between the membrane and peripheral wall is segmented into two distinct zones: a first section where sealing contact is maintained for proper valve function, and a second section where sealing contact is canceled to eliminate hysteresis. This segmentation allows the valve to maintain reliability while reducing pressure loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the membrane-peripheral wall interface have different functional qualities: the first section provides sealing contact for valve operation, while the second section provides a bypass path with no sealing contact to eliminate hysteresis. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between maintaining valve function and eliminating pressure loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the membrane elasticity is maintained for valve operation, then the valve can respond to pressure changes, but the response time increases due to hysteresis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve responseVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane sealing contact is segmented into a first section for valve operation and a second section canceled to eliminate hysteresis. This allows the valve to maintain its pressure-responsive operation while removing the time-delaying hysteresis effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The harmful hysteresis effect is extracted and removed by canceling the sealing contact in the second section of the membrane-peripheral wall interface, while preserving the necessary sealing contact in the first section for valve operation. This extraction eliminates the time loss without compromising operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Manufacturing precision

If the membrane sealing contact is maintained for pressure control, then the valve can regulate flow, but manufacturing tolerances and wear affect performance consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing contact is segmented into a first section that maintains manufacturing precision requirements and a second section that is canceled to eliminate sensitivity to tolerances and wear. This segmentation improves reliability by removing the performance-critical sealing contact from the hysteresis-prone second section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The source of performance inconsistency (the sealing contact in the second section) is extracted and removed. By canceling this sealing contact, the valve becomes less sensitive to manufacturing tolerances and wear, thereby improving performance consistency while maintaining necessary pressure control in the first section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design suppresses hysteresis, allowing for quicker and more precise control of the valve, reducing the impact of membrane wear and tolerances on the valve's performance and enhancing pressure control accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

the elastic deformation of the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the hysteresis described is eliminated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHysteresis: Hysteresis

Data Source

PatentEP3752757B1Flow path switching valve
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 OETIKER SCHWEIZ AG
  • EP3752757B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3752757B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3752757B1 patent drawingFigure 6~9d

AI summary

The flow path switching valve described here has a valve chamber (13) with three openings (21, 22, 23) and a valve piston (14) disposed in the valve chamber. The valve piston (14) has an elastic diaphragm (15) which cooperates sealingly at the circumference thereof with an inner circumferential wall (16) of the valve chamber (13). The valve piston (14) is movable between two end positions: in a first end position, it opens a flow path between the first opening (21) and the second opening (22) and blocks the third opening (23), and in the second end position, it blocks the first opening (21) and opens a flow path between the second opening (22) and the third opening (23). The valve chamber wall (16) is shaped such that the sealing contact between the diaphragm (15) and the inner wall is undone, at least around some of the circumference, in the last phase of the diaphragm movement into the first end position.