Organic High-Explosive Flow Synthesis Below Critical Diameter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Batch synthesis of organic high explosives poses significant safety hazards due to the risk of detonation, especially when large quantities of explosive material accumulate in a reactor, necessitating large safety radii and extensive safety measures.

Innovation Solution

The use of flow synthesis in a flow reactor with internal diameters smaller than the critical diameter of the explosive material, combined with controlled temperature and quenching agents, prevents detonation by allowing continuous production of smaller quantities of explosives, which can be safely collected remotely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If batch synthesis is used to produce large quantities of explosives, then productivity increases, but the risk of detonation and safety hazards worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction quantityVSAvoiddetonation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The batch synthesis process is segmented into continuous flow steps with small reaction volumes. The reactor system divides the production into multiple small-scale continuous reactions rather than one large batch, limiting the amount of explosive material present at any time and reducing detonation risk while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static batch processing to dynamic continuous flow processing. Reactants are continuously fed and products continuously removed, allowing the reaction to proceed in a controlled dynamic state that prevents accumulation of hazardous materials while sustaining high production rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If large quantities of explosive material are accumulated in a reactor, then productivity improves, but the safety radius and safety measures required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction outputVSAvoidsafety radius
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The hazardous explosive material is continuously extracted from the reaction zone as it forms, rather than allowing it to accumulate. The product is immediately removed from the reactor system and transferred to safe storage, separating the production function from the storage function and eliminating the need for large safety radii around storage areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If flow synthesis with small internal diameter pipes is used, then detonation risk decreases, but the productivity and production scale are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetonation riskVSAvoidproduction volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple small-diameter flow reactors are merged into a parallel array system. Each reactor maintains the safe small internal diameter for low detonation risk, while the combined output of multiple reactors achieves the required large-scale production volume. This merges safety at the unit level with productivity at the system level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces the risk of detonation by enabling safe and controlled production of explosives in smaller batches, minimizing the need for extensive safety measures and allowing for scalable production without the accumulation of hazardous materials.

Implementation Method 1

selecting the internal diameter of the pipe such that it is less than the critical diameter of the organic high explosive, thereby preventing detonation of the formed organic high explosive in said flow reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCritical diameter effect:

Implementation Method 2

The nitration reaction is typically exothermic and the flow reactor may be temperature controlled to ensure that the explosive material formed does not run to detonation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 3

Solution D, may comprise cooled water, to cause precipitation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Data Source

PatentUS20250223243A1Synthesizing an organic high explosive in a flow reactor
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • US20250223243A1 patent drawing
  • US20250223243A1 patent drawing
  • US20250223243A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of synthesising an organic high explosive includes the steps ofi) providing a first solution A,ii) providing a second solution B,wherein the admixture of solution A and solution B are selected such that they are capable upon formation of the admixture of reacting together to provide an organic high explosive, andiii) causing the solution A and B to be mixed and passed through a flow reactor to create an admixture,wherein the flow reactor includes a pipe, wherein the internal diameter of the pipe is selected such that it is less than the critical diameter of the organic high explosive, thereby preventing detonation of the formed organic high explosive in said flow reactor.