Flow Reactor Mixing via Varying Cross-Sectional Obstacles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flow reactors face challenges in achieving optimal mixing performance while minimizing pressure drop, which is crucial for process intensification in chemical engineering, as they often require larger equipment sizes and higher energy consumption.

Innovation Solution

The flow reactor design features a module with a process fluid passage having a continually varying cross-sectional shape and multiple obstacles that extend partially across the chamber, creating bypass paths and ensuring that no direct line of sight exists from the entrance to the exit, thereby enhancing mixing efficiency and reducing pressure drop.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional flow reactor channel designs are used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but mixing performance is insufficient and pressure drop is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel structure simplicityVSAvoidmixing performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The channel is divided into multiple sections with different cross-sectional shapes along the flow direction. Each section has specific geometric features (rectangular, trapezoidal, triangular configurations) that create localized flow patterns, enhancing mixing while maintaining overall structural simplicity and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a simple two-dimensional channel to a three-dimensional structure with varying cross-sectional shapes. By modifying the vertical and lateral dimensions at different channel positions, complex flow patterns are generated that improve mixing performance without significantly complicating the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of stationary object

If conventional flow reactor channel designs are used, then equipment size is larger, but the device becomes less compact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor sizeVSAvoidprocess intensification
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is segmented into multiple functional zones within a compact footprint. By arranging different cross-sectional sections sequentially along the flow path, the design achieves high process intensification in a reduced volume, transforming large-scale processes into smaller, more efficient systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functional elements are nested within the channel structure. The varying cross-sections create nested flow patterns where fluid streams are repeatedly folded and mixed within the same physical space, maximizing productivity while minimizing reactor volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of manufacture

If simple channel geometries are used, then manufacturing is easier, but mass transfer efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel geometry simplicityVSAvoidmass transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Different sections of the channel have locally optimized geometries tailored to specific functional requirements. Rectangular sections provide stable flow, trapezoidal sections enhance mixing, and triangular sections promote mass transfer. This local differentiation maximizes mass transfer efficiency while maintaining overall manufacturing simplicity through standardized fabrication methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design results in improved mixing performance and lower pressure drop, leading to more energy-efficient and compact reactor systems, aligning with the goals of process intensification by optimizing mass and heat transfer coefficients.

Implementation Method 1

a cross-sectional shape which varies continually along the portion... a plurality of obstacles distributed along the portion... enhancing mixing efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

successive chambers each with a nozzle-like entrance and a narrowing exit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3661640B1Improved process-intensified flow reactor
Publication Date: 2023.10.25 CORNING INC
  • EP3661640B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3661640B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP3661640B1 patent drawingFigure 7~10

AI summary

A flow reactor has a module having a process fluid passage with an interior surface, a portion of the passage including a cross section along the portion having a cross-sectional shape, and a cross-sectional area with multiple minima along the passage. The cross-sectional shape varies continually along the portion and the interior surface of the portion includes either no pairs of opposing flat parallel sides or only pairs of opposing flat parallel sides which extend for a length of no more than 4 times a distance between said opposing flat parallel sides along the portion and the portion contains a plurality of obstacles distributed along the portion.