Flow Straightener for Uniform Particulate Fluid Distribution in Honeycomb Filter Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting defects in honeycomb filters, such as those used in diesel particulate filtration, face challenges in achieving uniform flow profiles, leading to ambiguous results, especially near the periphery of the filter, due to boundary layer influences and non-uniform particulate distribution.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a flow straightener in the particulate fluid path, minimizing boundary layer effects by using a pipe with a larger inner diameter than the filter and vanes to ensure a substantially uniform flow velocity profile across the filter's end face, combined with a particulate generator producing a fog or mist to uniformly test the filter's integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a pipe is used to deliver particulate fluid to the filter, then the system is simple and easy to implement, but boundary layer effects cause non-uniform flow distribution across the filter face

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidflow uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pipe is segmented by introducing a flow straightener component with multiple flow channels that divide the single pipe flow into multiple parallel streams, which then recombine to create uniform flow distribution across the filter face

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A flow straightener is introduced as an intermediary component between the pipe and the filter. This flow straightener contains flow channels with flow straightening elements that condition the flow before it reaches the filter, eliminating boundary layer effects while maintaining system simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If conventional flow delivery is used, then the system is simple, but defect detection precision is reduced due to ambiguous results from non-uniform flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddefect detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The flow straightener performs preliminary flow conditioning before the particulate fluid reaches the filter. By pre-straightening the flow and eliminating boundary layer effects upstream, the detection accuracy is improved without requiring complex post-processing or additional measurement equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If a flow straightener with flow channels is introduced, then flow uniformity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow uniformityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow straightener is designed to perform multiple functions within a single component: it distributes flow uniformly across the filter face, straightens the flow direction, and eliminates boundary layer effects. This multi-functionality achieves flow uniformity without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for reliable detection of defects throughout the honeycomb body by ensuring consistent and uniform particulate flow, reducing ambiguity and enhancing the ability to identify defects, especially at the periphery, thereby improving filtration efficiency and filter integrity testing.

Implementation Method 1

A flow straightener in the flow path minimizes boundary layer effects of the pipe on the flow of the particulate fluid through the filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer effects: Boundary Layer

Implementation Method 2

vanes to ensure a substantially uniform flow velocity profile across the filter's end face

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow velocity profile uniformity: Laminar Flow

Implementation Method 3

a particulate generator producing a fog or mist to uniformly test the filter's integrity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFog or mist generation: Aerosol

Data Source

PatentEP1910802B1Method and system for detecting defects in a honeycomb body using a particulate fluid
Publication Date: 2013.03.27 CORNING INC
  • EP1910802B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1910802B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP1910802B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A system, apparatus and method for detecting defects in a honeycomb body. The system and apparatus include a fixture adapted to hold the honeycomb body, a particulate fluid source, a pipe which defines a flow path between the particulate fluid source and a first end face of the honeycomb body thereby allowing particulate fluid to flow from the particulate fluid source to the first end face of the honeycomb body. The particulate fluid emerges at a second end face of the honeycomb body through defects, if any, in the honeycomb body where the positions of such defects may be monitored. The system and apparatus includes a flow straightener disposed in the flow path to minimize boundary layer influence of the pipe on the flow of the particulate fluid. A substantially uniform velocity flow profile is provided to the first end face of the honeycomb body.