Flow Rate Control Valve Sealing Layout for Low Rotational Torque

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing flow control valve designs experience high rotational torque due to excessive sliding resistance from seal members, leading to increased friction and potential size enlargement of the drive mechanism.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a flow rate control valve with a reduced number of seal members in contact with the valve body, utilizing a seal member between the main communication hole and the valve body, and non-contact seal portions between auxiliary communication holes and the valve body, which adjust fluid leakage based on rotational position to minimize friction and drive mechanism size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If seal members are provided between the hot-water inlet pipe and the valve body and between the hot-water outlet pipe and the valve body, then sealing performance is improved, but sliding resistance increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidsliding resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes seal members from the auxiliary communication holes, extracting only the necessary sealing elements from the system. By providing seal members only at the main communication hole while leaving auxiliary holes without contact seals, the invention eliminates unnecessary sliding friction while maintaining essential sealing functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different sealing qualities to different locations: contact seals are provided only where necessary (main communication hole) while non-contact seals are used where friction should be minimized (auxiliary communication holes). This local differentiation optimizes the balance between sealing performance and rotational smoothness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If multiple seal members are provided to prevent fluid leakage, then sealing reliability is improved, but rotational torque increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidrotational torque
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts unnecessary seal members from the auxiliary communication holes, keeping only the essential seal at the main communication hole. This reduction eliminates excess friction that would increase rotational torque while maintaining adequate sealing where fluid flow occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of providing contact seals everywhere and accepting high torque, the patent inverts the approach by using non-contact seals at auxiliary holes where friction should be minimized, and contact seals only where sealing is critical at the main communication hole.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If seal members are provided between the valve body and the housing, then sealing performance is improved, but friction during rotation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidfriction during rotation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes contact seal members from auxiliary communication holes, extracting only the necessary sealing elements. This reduces the number of contact interfaces that generate friction during rotation while maintaining sealing where fluid actually flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies contact sealing only locally at the main communication hole where sealing is critical, while using non-contact sealing at auxiliary holes where minimal friction is desired. This localized approach optimizes both sealing and rotational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces friction during valve rotation, leading to a smaller drive mechanism size and controlled fluid leakage, effectively managing temperature changes in the cooling system.

Implementation Method 1

A pressure drop is caused due to a space portion on the fluid leaked out into the second auxiliary communication hole via the space portion formed between an inner peripheral surface of a valve body containing portion and an outer peripheral surface of a valve body circumferential wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS11378189B2Flow rate control valve and cooling system
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 ASTEMO LTD
  • US11378189B2 patent drawing
  • US11378189B2 patent drawing
  • US11378189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flow rate control valve has a housing including a valve body and a main communication hole and auxiliary communication holes. The valve body includes a fluid inflow portion, a main opening portion and auxiliary opening portions formed on the valve body circumferential wall and establish fluid communication. A seal member is provided between the main communication hole and the valve body, and configured to seal between the valve body and the main communication hole. The valve body establishes the communication between one auxiliary communication hole and one auxiliary opening portion regardless of a rotational position of the valve body. In addition, the valve body changes a communication state between the main communication hole and the main opening portion and a communication state between another auxiliary communication hole and another auxiliary opening portion according to the rotational position of the valve body.