Flue Gas Impurity Removal via Indirect Cooling and Scrubbing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flue gas desulphurization techniques are unable to reduce impurity concentrations, such as SO3, SO2, and NO2, to below 10 ppmv, leading to carbon capture solvent degradation, increased emissions, and higher costs due to accelerated solvent loss and emissions, and the need for continuous supplementation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system involving indirect cooling of flue gases using heat exchangers and a scrubbing solution comprising sodium bicarbonate or sodium carbonate to reduce impurity concentrations before carbon capture, preventing acid mist formation and extending solvent lifespan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional flue gas desulphurisation techniques are used, then the process is simple and cost-effective, but the impurity concentration cannot be reduced to below 10 ppmv

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpurity concentration reductionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impurity removal process is divided into multiple stages: first cooling the flue gas to condense SO3 and remove acid mist, then using a scrubbing solution to remove SO2 and NO2. This segmentation allows each stage to target specific impurities effectively, achieving concentrations below 10 ppmv that cannot be achieved by single-stage traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flue gas is cooled and pre-treated to remove acid mist and condense SO3 before the main scrubbing process. This preliminary action protects the carbon capture solvent from degradation by acid mist, enabling the subsequent scrubbing process to achieve higher impurity removal efficiencies without solvent damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If impurity concentration is not reduced prior to carbon capture, then the carbon capture process is simpler, but solvent degradation and loss accelerate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolvent lifespanVSAvoidpre-treatment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flue gas is cooled to condense and remove acid mist (SO3) before contact with the carbon capture solvent. This preliminary anti-action prevents acid mist from degrading the solvent, extending solvent lifespan and reducing losses. The scrubbing solution simultaneously removes SO2 and NO2, providing comprehensive protection against solvent degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Loss of substance

If acid mist is present in the flue gas, then the cooling process is simpler, but solvent emissions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolvent emissionsVSAvoidflue gas temperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The flue gas temperature is controlled to be above the dew point of SO3 during the cooling process, preventing condensation and acid mist formation. By maintaining this temperature parameter, the system avoids solvent emissions caused by acid mist while still achieving effective impurity removal through the scrubbing solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively reduces impurity concentrations to below 2 ppmv, minimizing solvent degradation, emissions, and operational costs, while enhancing carbon capture efficiency and reducing the load on Effluent Treatment Plants.

Implementation Method 1

indirectly cooling a flue gas comprising carbon dioxide (CO2), the flue gas having a starting temperature of from 115° C. to 200° C., to form a cooled flue gas having a cooled temperature of less than 95° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

contacting the further cooled flue gas with a carbon capture solvent such that the carbon capture solvent removes carbon dioxide (CO2) from the cooled flue gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption: Absorption (physical)

Implementation Method 3

Acid mist is formed in a boiler or a wet flue gas desulphurisation vessel when the temperature of a flue gas drops below the dew point of SO3. At these temperatures, SO3 condenses either as small fog droplets resulting in the formation of acid mist

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS20240307813A1Methods and systems for the removal of impurities in a flue gas
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 CARBON CLEAN SOLUTIONS
  • US20240307813A1 patent drawing
  • US20240307813A1 patent drawing
  • US20240307813A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and a system for the removal of impurities from a flue gas. In particular, the present invention relates to a method and a system for the removal of impurities such as SO3 (acid mist), SO2 (sulphur dioxide), NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) from a CO2 (carbon dioxide) rich flue gas.