Flue Gas Waste Acidizing for Carbonate Reservoirs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies for flue gas desulfurization and denitrification do not effectively utilize the products, leading to secondary pollution, and traditional acid fracturing methods face issues such as short acting distance, strong corrosiveness, and low efficiency in carbonate reservoirs.

Innovation Solution

A method that couples flue gas desulfurization and denitrification with reservoir acidizing, using a desulfurizing and denitrating agent and an oxidizing agent as curing agents, to generate an acid liquor from waste liquor, which is then injected into a carbonate reservoir for acidizing and stimulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If traditional acid fracturing is used in carbonate reservoirs, then the acidizing process can be performed, but the acting distance is short and the reaction rate is too fast

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacting distanceVSAvoidreaction rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state of nitric acid from liquid to solid powder form, and controls the hydrolysis rate through curing agent selection and reservoir temperature conditions, transforming the rapid liquid-phase reaction into a controlled solid-phase hydrolysis process that extends acting distance while maintaining effective reaction rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Length of moving object

If nitric acid powdered acidizing is used, then the acting distance is extended, but the corrosiveness increases and the cost rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacting distanceVSAvoidcorrosiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates curing agents (urea, ethanolamine, ammonia, or multidentate ligands) that beforehand neutralize the strong corrosiveness of nitric acid powder, creating a buffered system that reduces harmful corrosion effects while preserving the acidizing functionality and extending acting distance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite acidizing system combining nitric acid powder with curing agents and optional corrosion inhibitors, where the composite material properties provide extended acting distance while the curing agent matrix mitigates corrosiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of operation

If traditional curing agents are used with nitric acid powder, then the operation is simplified, but the alkalinity is weak and acting distance is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidalkalinity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enhances the alkalinity parameter by selecting curing agents with stronger basic properties, particularly multidentate ligands that provide superior alkalinity compared to traditional weak bases like urea, thereby extending acting distance while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If desulfurization and denitrification products are discharged or stored, then the pollution is controlled, but secondary pollution such as water eutrophication occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatmospheric pollution controlVSAvoidsecondary pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful nitrogen-containing waste liquor from desulfurization and denitrification processes into a beneficial acidizing agent for carbonate reservoirs, where the nitrates and sulfates serve as the active acidizing components, eliminating the need for discharge or storage and preventing water eutrophication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the waste liquor serve multiple functions: it acts as both the acidizing agent and the source of nitric and sulfuric acid through hydrolysis, while simultaneously addressing environmental pollution concerns, thereby giving the waste product universal utility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively reduces acidizing costs, achieves deep acidizing, and increases production and injection in oil-water wells, while also controlling environmental pollution and preventing secondary pollution such as water eutrophication.

Implementation Method 1

NOx and SOx in the flue gas react with a desulfurizing and denitrating agent to generate corresponding nitrates and sulfates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

reservoir temperature enables the nitrates and sulfates in the waste liquor to be slowly hydrolyzed to generate H2SO4 and HNO3

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 3

the generated acid reacts with the reservoir to achieve effects of acidizing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 4

the desulfurizing and denitrating agent coordinate with Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe3+ to achieve corrosion inhibition and iron ion stability in pipelines

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChelation: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS12221874B2Method for increasing production and injection of reservoir coupled with flue gas desulfurization and denitrification
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 CHINA SHI DA EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CO LTD
  • US12221874B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The last sentence of the abstract has been deleted because it refers to purported merits of the invention. The abstract should not refer to purported merits or speculative applications of the invention and should not compare the invention with the prior art, therefore the abstract has been amended to delete the last sentence by Examiner's amendment.