Fluid Bed Steam Cracking Direct Heating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional steam cracking processes face challenges with coke formation, inefficient heating control, and the need for specialized catalysts, especially when processing feeds with resid boiling range components, leading to shortened process cycles and large refinery footprints.

Innovation Solution

The use of direct heating with a cracking zone cooler than the heating zone, employing silica particles for heat transfer, and operating at an oxygen stoichiometric ratio of 1.2 or less to form synthesis gas, which reduces coke buildup and allows for improved control over cracking temperatures and residence time, while also facilitating integration with other refinery processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If indirect heating is used in conventional steam crackers, then heating control is achieved through furnace design, but coke accumulates rapidly on reactor tube walls requiring multiple furnaces and shortened process cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess cycle lengthVSAvoidcoke accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the heating function from the reaction environment by introducing external hot particles into the cracking zone. This separates the heating source from the reactor tubes, preventing coke accumulation on tube walls while maintaining effective heating control through particle circulation and temperature regulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Hot particles serve as an intermediary heat transfer medium between the heating zone and the cracking zone. These particles carry thermal energy from the heating zone to the cracking zone, enabling indirect heating within the direct heating system and preventing direct contact between fuel combustion products and the cracking environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Use of energy by moving object

If direct heating is used with fuel combustion in the same reactor, then heating efficiency improves, but flue gases dilute the desired light olefins products

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheating efficiencyVSAvoidlight olefins concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor is segmented into distinct heating zone and cracking zone. The heating zone contains fuel combustion for heat generation, while the cracking zone maintains a separate environment for steam cracking. Hot particles circulate between zones to transfer heat without mixing combustion flue gases with the cracking products, preserving light olefins concentration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Hot particles act as an intermediary that transfers thermal energy from the heating zone to the cracking zone without requiring direct mixing of combustion gases and cracking feed. This maintains heating efficiency while preventing dilution of light olefins with flue gases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If high temperature direct heating is used for steam cracking, then cracking efficiency improves, but controlling residence time becomes difficult leading to overcracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecracking efficiencyVSAvoidresidence time control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic particle circulation to control residence time. Particles are continuously circulated between the heating zone and cracking zone at controlled rates, allowing the feed to be exposed to high temperatures for precisely controlled durations. This dynamic control prevents overcracking while maintaining high cracking efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The particle circulation system provides feedback control for residence time. By monitoring particle temperature and circulation rate, the system adjusts the time feed material spends in the cracking zone, ensuring optimal cracking conditions without excessive residence time that would lead to overcracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If multiple furnaces operate in parallel for continuous production, then production continuity is maintained, but refinery footprint increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous productionVSAvoidrefinery footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous production through continuous circulation of hot particles between heating and cracking zones within a single reactor. This eliminates the need for multiple furnaces operating in parallel, as the particle circulation provides continuous heat supply without requiring shutdowns for decoking, thereby reducing refinery footprint while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables longer cycle lengths, reduced coke accumulation, minimized catalyst concerns, and increased control over cracking conditions, allowing for efficient processing of heavy feeds and reducing the refinery footprint by utilizing coke as fuel and generating beneficial synthesis gas.

Implementation Method 1

transporting heat transfer particles from a heating zone to a cracking zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

A fluidized bed of heat transfer particles can be sufficiently well-mixed to allow the bed to have a substantially uniform temperature throughout the fluidized bed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 3

at least a portion of the coke that forms on the heat transfer particles can be combusted in the heating zone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS12152207B2Fluid bed steam cracking using direct heating
Publication Date: 2024.11.26 EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC
  • US12152207B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for performing steam cracking on a feed while using direct heating of the reaction environment. The heating of the reaction environment can be achieved in part by transporting heat transfer particles from a heating zone to cracking zone. This can be performed in a fluidized bed reactor, a moving bed reactor, a riser reactor, or another type of reactor that can allow for catalyst movement and regeneration during operation.