Fluid connection assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fluid connectors for refrigeration systems require high insertion force for assembly, necessitate post-process machining, are prone to misplacement of retaining clips, and lack clear assembly indicators, leading to potential structural integrity issues and prolonged assembly times.

Innovation Solution

A fluid connection assembly with a service valve body and a retainer that includes annular grooves and flanges, allowing for quick assembly without tools and providing visual assembly confirmation, using a quick connect mechanism with O-rings and a plastic retainer to secure tubes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If traditional retaining clips are used in fluid connectors, then the connector can secure the tube, but the insertion force required is very large and assembly is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion forceVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is divided into two separate sections that can be independently assembled. The first section is installed on the connector body, and the second section is installed on the tube, eliminating the need for high insertion force to install a single complex retaining clip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retainers are pre-installed onto the connector body and tube before the final assembly. This preliminary action eliminates the need for high insertion force during the final connection, as the retainers are already in place to guide and secure the components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If retaining clips are made thin and small to fit in the connector, then the connector structure is compact, but the clips are easy to lose if dropped or misplaced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector structure compactnessVSAvoidretaining clip loss risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single small retaining clip is segmented into two larger retainers that are easier to handle and less prone to loss. The first retainer remains on the connector body and the second retainer remains on the tube, reducing the risk of both being lost during assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining function is extracted from a single small clip and distributed to two separate retainers. This extraction allows each retainer to be larger and more manageable, reducing the likelihood of loss while maintaining the compact connector structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If slots or apertures are machined in the connector body for the retaining clip, then the connector can engage the tube, but post-process manufacturing is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector manufacturing processVSAvoidslot or aperture machining precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The retainers are designed to be pre-installed on the connector body and tube before final assembly, eliminating the need for post-process machining of slots or apertures. The retainers themselves provide the engagement features needed for secure connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement function is extracted from the connector body structure and transferred to separate retainer components. This eliminates the need to machine slots or apertures in the connector body, simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining secure tube engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If traditional fluid connectors are used, then the connection can be secured, but the assembly process takes a long time and may require tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection securityVSAvoidassembly speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The assembly process is segmented into simple steps where pre-installed retainers guide the connection. The first retainer on the connector body and the second retainer on the tube work together to secure the connection without requiring tools or complex assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retainers are designed to self-align and self-secure during assembly. The pre-installed retainers guide the tube into the connector body and automatically secure the connection, eliminating the need for tools or complex assembly procedures while maintaining reliable connection security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12429261B2Fluid connection assembly
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 OTIKER NJ INK
  • US12429261B2 patent drawing
  • US12429261B2 patent drawing
  • US12429261B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluid connection assembly, including a service valve body, including a first section forming a first port and a second port, a second section connected to the first section and forming a third port, a connector body forming a fourth port and including a first end connected to the first section, a second end, a first radially outward facing surface including an annular groove, and a first radially inward facing surface.