Fluid Control Valve Spring Mechanism for Flow Rate Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid control valves face limitations in controlling flow rates over a wide range due to rapid increase in pressure-receiving area and potential for metal contact leading to rust, resulting in unstable flow control and reduced controllability at low flow rates.

Innovation Solution

A fluid control valve design incorporating a spring mechanism that balances the valve element away from the valve seat when the solenoid is not powered, using a combination of first and second coil springs to maintain a predetermined clearance, allowing for improved responsiveness and controllability of flow rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the valve element is biased to make contact with the valve seat using a spring, then the valve-closed state is maintained when the solenoid is not powered, but the flow rate control range decreases and responsiveness deteriorates when fluid pressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve-closed state maintenanceVSAvoidflow rate control range
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the valve element's state from static (always biased to contact) to dynamic (maintaining a predetermined clearance). The spring mechanism is configured to hold the valve element away from the valve seat by a specific distance, allowing the valve to respond dynamically to fluid pressure changes without the limitations of constant contact biasing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the key parameter of valve element position by introducing a predetermined clearance rather than allowing direct contact. This parameter change enables the pressure-receiving area to remain constant regardless of valve opening degree, thereby expanding the controllable flow rate range and improving responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If the valve element separates from the valve seat rapidly when fluid pressure increases, then the valve opens quickly, but the pressure-receiving area increases rapidly causing unstable flow rate control at low flow rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve opening speedVSAvoidflow rate control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-positioning the valve element at a predetermined clearance from the valve seat using the spring mechanism. This preliminary positioning ensures that when fluid pressure increases, the valve element opens smoothly from a known starting position rather than experiencing rapid, uncontrolled separation, thereby maintaining stable flow rate control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the valve element makes direct contact with the valve seat, then the shut-off function is achieved, but metal contact causes rust generation and adhesion problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshut-off functionVSAvoidrust and adhesion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (the predetermined clearance maintained by the spring) between the valve element and valve seat. This intermediary prevents direct metal-to-metal contact during normal operation, eliminating the harmful effects of rust and adhesion while preserving the shut-off function when the solenoid activates and overcomes the spring bias.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables timely and precise control of fluid flow rates over a wide range by maintaining a consistent pressure-receiving area and preventing rapid clearance increase, thus enhancing the valve's responsiveness and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a spring mechanism holding the valve element to be balanced at a position at which the valve element is away from the valve seat by a predetermined distance in a case where the solenoid is inhibited from being supplied with the electric power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a solenoid causing the valve element to make contact with the valve seat in a state where the solenoid is supplied with an electric power

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP2733399B1Fluid control valve
Publication Date: 2017.12.06 AISIN SEIKI KK
  • EP2733399B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2733399B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2733399B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A fluid control valve (V) includes a body portion (4) provided at a circulation flow passage (2) that circulates fluid between an internal combustion engine (E) and a heat exchanger (H), an inflow passage (5), an outflow passage (6), a valve element (7), a valve seat (8) including a contact portion (8a) relative to the valve element, the contact portion being provided to face a downstream side of a circulating direction of the fluid, a solenoid (9) causing the valve element to make contact with the valve seat in a state where the solenoid is supplied with an electric power, and a spring mechanism (10) holding the valve element to be balanced at a position at which the valve element is away from the valve seat by a predetermined distance (L) in a case where the solenoid is inhibited from being supplied with the electric power and the fluid is inhibited from flowing.