Fluid-filled damper system with restricted flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional damping systems in wearable applications, such as athletic apparel and protective padding, fail to provide adaptive response characteristics to varying impact velocities and magnitudes, leading to performance degradation and durability issues due to fixed-response materials and simple fluid systems lacking directional control.

Innovation Solution

A fluid-filled damper system with strategically positioned fluid chambers and a flow restrictor that limits fluid transfer between chambers, creating a progressive damping response proportional to the magnitude and rate of compression, enhancing protection and comfort without external control systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed-response damping materials are used, then the structure is simple, but the system cannot adapt to different impact velocities and magnitudes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive response to varying impact conditionsVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The damping system is divided into multiple fluid chambers (first chamber, second chamber, and third chamber) that are interconnected through flow restrictors. This segmentation allows different chambers to handle different aspects of the damping response, enabling adaptive behavior to varying impact conditions while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses flow restrictors with specific geometries (such as tapered passages or orifices) that create dynamic resistance to fluid flow between chambers. The resistance varies with flow rate, allowing the system to automatically adapt its damping characteristics based on the velocity and magnitude of applied impacts without requiring external control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If simple fluid-based systems are used, then the device complexity is reduced, but directional control of energy dissipation is minimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectional control of energy dissipationVSAvoidchamber configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different chambers are positioned and configured with specific properties to handle different directions and types of forces. The first chamber may be optimized for compression, the second for expansion, and the third for lateral or shear forces. This local differentiation of chamber qualities enables directional control of energy dissipation while maintaining a relatively simple fluid-based system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Flow restrictors serve as intermediary elements between chambers, controlling and directing fluid flow based on the applied forces. These restrictors mediate the energy dissipation process by regulating fluid transfer between chambers, providing directional control without requiring complex mechanical structures or external control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If conventional damping materials are used, then manufacturing is simple, but performance degrades over time due to compression set and environmental exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance consistency over timeVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses fluid (liquid or gas) contained in flexible chambers to provide damping, replacing conventional solid damping materials. This hydraulic/pneumatic approach eliminates compression set issues because fluids do not permanently deform under compression. The flexible chambers can be manufactured using成熟的 techniques such as blow-molding or laminating, maintaining ease of manufacture while significantly improving reliability and performance consistency over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Adaptability or versatility

If flow restrictor limits fluid transfer, then progressive damping response is achieved, but fluid flow between chambers is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogressive damping responseVSAvoidfluid transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The flow restrictors are designed with specific geometric parameters (such as passage area, length, and taper angle) that create a progressive damping response. By carefully selecting these parameters, the system achieves optimal balance between providing progressive resistance during impact and allowing sufficient fluid transfer to maintain responsiveness. The restrictor geometry is optimized so that fluid transfer efficiency is adequate for the intended application while still producing the desired progressive damping effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides adaptive, progressive resistance that increases with impact force and velocity, maintaining performance over numerous cycles and environmental conditions, ensuring reliable protection and comfort in athletic activities.

Implementation Method 1

a flow restrictor providing fluidic communication between the chambers. The flow restrictor is configured to limit the rate of fluid transfer between the first fluid chamber and the second fluid chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow restriction: Viscous Damping

Implementation Method 2

When force is applied to the first fluid chamber during athletic activity, fluid is displaced into the second fluid chamber through the flow restrictor, which limits the rate of fluid transfer and creates a progressive damping effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid compression and displacement: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS20250359610A1Fluid-filled damper system with restricted flow
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 NIKE INC
  • US20250359610A1 patent drawing
  • US20250359610A1 patent drawing
  • US20250359610A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluid-filled damper system for apparel and protective padding manages impact forces through controlled fluid movement between chambers. The system includes a flexible bladder defining first and second fluid chambers connected by a flow restrictor that limits fluid transfer rate between chambers. When force is applied to the first chamber, fluid displaces into the second chamber at a rate regulated by the flow restrictor, creating progressive damping that varies with compression rate.