Fluid Dispenser Drop Patterns for Substrate Planarization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing nano-fabrication techniques face challenges in achieving larger production yields with increased circuits per unit area while maintaining process control and reducing feature dimensions, and planarization techniques struggle to address substrate height variations, affecting the ability to add further layers and impacting critical dimensions and depth of focus in lithographic processes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves specifying nozzle or fluid-dispense port groups for fluid dispensers, determining combined coverage heights and ranges, and selecting scanning patterns based on these groups and ranges to optimize drop placement, using shift values and pass combinations to ensure comprehensive coverage and minimize defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional planarization techniques are used to address substrate height variations, then substrate flatness is improved, but manufacturing complexity and process time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate flatnessVSAvoidplanarization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical planarization methods with a fluid dispensing system that deposits material in controlled drop patterns. This substitution eliminates complex mechanical planarization equipment while achieving the same substrate flatness improvement through precise fluid placement and curing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from mechanical removal to material addition by controlling drop size, spacing, and distribution parameters. By adjusting these fluid dispensing parameters, the system achieves planarization with simpler equipment while maintaining manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If substrate height variations are not addressed, then process simplicity is maintained, but critical dimension control and depth of focus deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidcritical dimension control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary planarization treatment before subsequent lithographic processes. By pre-flattening the substrate surface through controlled fluid dispensing and curing, the system ensures optimal critical dimension control and depth of focus in later steps without adding complexity to those subsequent processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the ability to planarize substrates, improving critical dimension control, feature placement, and depth of focus, thereby enabling more efficient fabrication of integrated circuits and meta optical elements with reduced feature dimensions.

Implementation Method 1

specifying nozzles of a fluid dispenser that are usable to eject fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid ejection through nozzles:

Implementation Method 2

the material is polymerized on the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS12459255B2Systems, devices, and methods for dispensing drops of fluid according to drop patterns
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 CANON KK
  • US12459255B2 patent drawing
  • US12459255B2 patent drawing
  • US12459255B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some devices, systems, and methods specify nozzles of a fluid dispenser that are usable to eject fluid and nozzles of the fluid dispenser that are not usable to eject fluid; specify contiguous nozzle groups of the nozzles that are usable to eject fluid; specify a coverage height of a largest contiguous nozzle group of the contiguous nozzle groups; determine, for one or more pass combinations, a respective combined coverage height, wherein each pass combination respectively includes two or more passes, of the fluid dispenser, that are shifted relative to each other by a shift value; and select, as a selected basis of a scanning pattern, the largest contiguous nozzle group or, alternatively, one of the one or more pass combinations based on the coverage height of the largest contiguous nozzle group and on the respective combined coverage height of each of the one or more pass combinations.