Fluid Ejection Device Safety Control via Supply Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fluid ejection devices for medical purposes may unintentionally eject fluid due to insufficient pressure or lack of fluid supply, posing safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A fluid ejection device with a control system that includes a fluid ejection unit, an ejection control unit, a fluid container, and a supply control unit, which determines if fluid can be supplied and prohibits ejection if not available, reporting a fault and canceling the ejection command until the fluid is replenished.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the fluid ejection device operates without sufficient fluid supply monitoring, then the device can respond quickly to ejection commands, but unintended fluid ejection may occur due to insufficient pressure or empty fluid container

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The supply control unit performs preliminary checks to determine whether the fluid container has sufficient fluid before allowing the ejection unit to operate. This preliminary action prevents unintended ejection by ensuring fluid availability is verified in advance, rather than waiting for ejection failure to detect the problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors fluid supply status and provides feedback to the ejection control unit. When the supply control unit detects insufficient fluid or pressure conditions, it sends feedback signals to prohibit ejection commands, creating a closed-loop safety mechanism that dynamically adjusts operation based on real-time fluid status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the supply control unit continuously monitors fluid supply status, then unintended ejection is prevented, but the control system becomes more complex and response time may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection control reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs fluid supply verification in advance before ejection commands are executed. By checking fluid levels and pressure conditions beforehand, the system prepares the ejection unit in a known good state, reducing the need for complex real-time monitoring during actual ejection operations and minimizing response time delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9561050B2Fluid ejection device
Publication Date: 2017.02.07 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US9561050B2 patent drawing
  • US9561050B2 patent drawing
  • US9561050B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluid ejection device includes a fluid ejection unit that ejects a fluid, an ejection control unit that receives a fluid ejection command input, and controls the ejection of the fluid from the fluid ejection unit, a fluid container that accommodates the fluid to be supplied to the fluid ejection unit; and a supply control unit that controls the supply of the fluid from the fluid container to the fluid ejection unit, and determines whether the fluid can be supplied to the fluid ejection unit from the fluid container. When the supply control unit determines that the fluid cannot be supplied even after the ejection command input is received, and then a predetermined amount of time has elapsed, the ejection control unit reports a fault, and prohibits the fluid ejection unit from ejecting the fluid until the ejection command input is canceled.