Fluid Heating Burner Combustion Control Using Learned Feedback Loops

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current combustion control methods for boilers and similar systems do not effectively account for factors like venting draft and venting restriction, leading to sub-optimal combustion at specific modulation percentages/firing rates.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of multiple feedback control loops that adapt based on various factors, including air-fuel ratio, NOx concentration, CO concentration, and other combustion parameters, to optimize combustion control. These loops learn trim values over time to ensure proper control even if sensors fail.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If continuous combustion control is used, then combustion is regulated at all operating conditions, but sub-optimal combustion occurs at specific modulation percentages due to unaccounted factors like venting draft and venting restriction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion control effectivenessVSAvoidcombustion optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the combustion control into multiple independent feedback loops, each responsible for specific parameters (O2 concentration, CO concentration, NOx concentration, flame characteristics). This segmentation allows each loop to optimize specific aspects of combustion without interfering with others, resolving the contradiction by enabling continuous control while maintaining optimization at all modulation percentages through specialized control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes control parameters by introducing multiple feedback variables (O2, CO, NOx, flame characteristics) instead of relying on a single control parameter. This multi-parameter approach allows the system to adapt to varying venting draft and restriction conditions at different modulation percentages, achieving both continuous regulation and optimal combustion performance across all operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If learned feedback control loops are implemented, then proper control is maintained even when sensors fail, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol continuityVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements learned feedback control loops that continuously learn and store optimal trim values during normal operation. This preliminary action builds a knowledge base of control parameters that can be rapidly deployed when sensors fail, ensuring control continuity without requiring complex real-time decision-making during fault conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the control system through learned feedback loops that replicate normal control behavior. When primary sensors fail, the system copies control decisions from the learned model, maintaining reliability without adding substantial physical hardware complexity, as the backup is implemented through software-based learning and prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple feedback control loops are used, then combustion is optimized at various operating conditions, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating condition coverageVSAvoidfeedback control structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the combustion control into multiple specialized feedback loops, each targeting specific combustion parameters (O2, CO, NOx, flame characteristics). This segmentation enables the system to adapt to various operating conditions by activating appropriate loops based on current conditions, achieving versatility while managing complexity through modular, independent control modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control loops that serve multiple functions simultaneously. For example, the O2 feedback loop not only controls air-fuel ratio but also provides data for learning optimal trim values across different modulation percentages. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by having each component serve multiple purposes rather than requiring dedicated systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4086515B1Fluid heating system with combustion trim learning
Publication Date: 2025.03.12 A O SMITH
  • EP4086515B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4086515B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4086515B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A fluid heating system including a burner unit is operated based on feedback control loops. The fluid heating system comprises a burner unit configured to heat a fluid, a sensor configured to sense a characteristic of the appliance, and a controller coupled to the burner unit and the sensor. The controller includes an electronic processor and a memory. The controller is configured to receive a first signal corresponding to the characteristic from the sensor, determine, based on the first signal, a first feedback loop control, control combustion of the burner unit based on the first feedback loop control, determine, based on the first feedback loop control, a second feedback loop control, and control combustion of the burner unit based on the second feedback loop control.