Fluid Injection Mixer with Vanes and Impingement Floor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixers for fluid injection systems in internal combustion engines, such as those using Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), face issues with reductant condensation on cool walls, premature injector wear, and inadequate mixing due to their downstream location and design, which can lead to reduced emission effectiveness and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

The proposed mixer design includes an impingement floor and side walls with shelves and vanes that promote mixing, positioned upstream of the reductant injector to prevent deposition on cool surfaces and enhance mixing efficiency, and can accommodate multiple injectors with adjustable geometry to accommodate varying spray patterns and sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the mixer is positioned downstream of the injector, then the additive mixing is improved, but the additive can be injected against cool walls causing condensation and deposits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadditive mixing efficiencyVSAvoidreductant condensation on cool walls
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The mixer is positioned upstream of the injector to pre-mix the exhaust gas and create optimal flow conditions before the additive is injected. This preliminary mixing action prevents the additive from being injected directly against cool walls, thereby preventing condensation and deposits while maintaining effective mixing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The mixer acts as an intermediary device that conditions the exhaust gas flow before the additive injection. By creating a controlled flow pattern and temperature distribution in the mixing chamber, it mediates between the hot exhaust gas and the cool walls, preventing direct contact between additive and cool surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the annular flange is used to engage the exhaust duct, then the mixer is secured in place, but it creates an obstruction for additive deposition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixer securingVSAvoidadditive deposition on flange
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The flange is removed from the mixer design entirely. Instead of using a flange to secure the mixer to the exhaust duct, the invention uses a diffuser outlet that flows directly into the exhaust duct without requiring a separate securing component, thereby eliminating the source of additive deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The diffuser outlet serves multiple functions: it secures the mixer to the exhaust duct through its integration with the duct geometry, creates a smooth flow transition, and eliminates obstructions that would cause additive deposition. This multi-functional design replaces the traditional flange-based securing method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the mixer is designed for a single additive injector, then the structure is simplified, but it cannot accommodate multiple injectors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixer structureVSAvoidinjector configuration compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mixer is designed with a universal geometry that can accommodate both single and multiple additive injectors. The mixing chamber and flow patterns are configured to handle variable injection configurations, allowing the same mixer design to be used across different system configurations without requiring modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The mixer incorporates adjustable or reconfigurable elements that allow it to adapt to different injector configurations. The flow channels and mixing surfaces can be optimized for various numbers and positions of injectors, enabling dynamic adaptation to different system requirements while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively inhibits reductant deposition on exhaust duct surfaces, reduces wear, and improves mixing efficiency, ensuring thorough reductant distribution and enhanced emission reduction capabilities, suitable for both single and multiple injector systems.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one shelf may have a plurality of vanes protruding toward and away from the impingement floor that promote mixing of an injected fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS9217353B2Mixer for fluid injection system
Publication Date: 2015.12.22 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US9217353B2 patent drawing
  • US9217353B2 patent drawing
  • US9217353B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mixer is disclosed for use in a fluid injection system. The mixer may have an impingement floor oriented generally perpendicular to an intended fluid injection direction and generally parallel with a flow direction. The mixer may also have a first side wall connected along a lengthwise edge of the impingement floor and generally parallel with the flow direction, and a second side wall connected along an opposing lengthwise edge of the impingement floor and generally parallel with the flow direction. The mixer may further have at least one shelf extending between the first and second side walls and generally parallel with the flow direction. The at least one shelf may have a plurality of vanes protruding toward and away from the impingement floor that promotes mixing of an injected fluid.