Fluid Distribution Manifold for Precise Multi-Outlet Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fluid distribution systems for applications like pool management face challenges in achieving precise flow rates due to limitations in valve actuators, requiring numerous valves and actuators, which increase complexity, cost, and space requirements, and are unstable under varying operational conditions.

Innovation Solution

A fluid distribution manifold with multiple valve assemblies and a control system that includes sensors and actuators to dynamically adjust flow rates, allowing for precise control and seamless integration of additional devices, enabling independent operation and maintenance of valve assemblies without disrupting the system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple valves and actuators are used to direct fluid flow to different fluid handling devices, then flow distribution capability is improved, but system complexity and installation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow distribution capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the fluid distribution function into multiple independent valve assemblies, each serving a specific fluid handling device. Each valve assembly is a self-contained unit with its own actuator, valve body, and flow control mechanism, allowing independent operation and simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The manifold structure provides a universal platform that can accommodate multiple different types of fluid handling devices (pumps, filters, heaters, water features) through standardized valve assemblies. The same basic valve assembly design can serve different devices, reducing the need for custom components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple valves and actuators are installed to serve different fluid handling devices, then flow control precision is improved, but installation time and labor cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control precisionVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The valve assemblies are pre-assembled and pre-configured with actuators and connections before installation. This preliminary preparation allows for quick installation by simply mounting the complete assemblies onto the manifold, significantly reducing on-site installation time and labor requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the system into modular valve assemblies, each unit can be independently installed and configured. This modular approach allows installers to work on one assembly at a time and enables parallel installation of multiple units, reducing overall installation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If more valves and plumbing components are used to serve additional fluid handling devices, then system functionality is improved, but physical space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple valve assemblies are merged onto a single manifold structure, consolidating what would otherwise be separate components into one integrated unit. This combining approach maintains full functionality for multiple fluid handling devices while occupying significantly less physical space than distributed valve installations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The manifold structure utilizes three-dimensional space efficiently by arranging valve assemblies in a compact configuration along the manifold body. This spatial arrangement allows multiple valves to be accessed and operated independently while maintaining a compact footprint suitable for pool equipment rooms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If each valve has its own controller for independent operation, then flow rate precision is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into independent controllers for each valve assembly, allowing each valve to be controlled individually based on specific flow rate requirements. This segmentation enables precise flow control for each fluid handling device while keeping the control logic for each valve relatively simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11579637B2Systems and methods for controlling fluid flow with a fluid distribution manifold
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 HAYWARD IND INC
  • US11579637B2 patent drawing
  • US11579637B2 patent drawing
  • US11579637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluid distribution manifold may receive a first required flow rate for a first flow of fluid that flows to a fluid handling device or a reservoir. A first operation state may be determined for a first valve assembly that regulates the first flow, the manifold may operate the first valve assembly based on the first operation state, and a first position tracker may be incremented based on the first operation. Based on a value of a cycle tracker, the manifold may identify a second valve assembly in an operation cycle and access a second control input that includes a second required flow rate for a second flow of fluid regulated by the second valve assembly. The manifold may cause the second valve assembly to operate based on at least one of a second operation state and a change in the second actual flow rate resulting from the first operation.