Fluid Moving Device Operational Settings via Multivariate Time Series Motif Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data center cooling systems are computationally intensive, making them impractical for real-time adaptive control, leading to inefficiencies in power consumption and increased carbon footprints due to lengthy implementation times of traditional computational fluid dynamics-based modeling approaches.

Innovation Solution

A method and analyzer that automatically determine operational settings for fluid moving devices by identifying motifs in utilization data as multivariate time series patterns, filtering through frequent episode mining, and calculating sustainability metrics to optimize energy use while meeting heat dissipation demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If computational fluid dynamics-based modeling is used to achieve adaptive cooling control, then cooling efficiency is improved, but implementation time becomes excessively long making it impractical for real-time control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling energy efficiencyVSAvoidimplementation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates simplified copies of the complex CFD models by training machine learning algorithms on historical CFD simulation data. These trained models serve as lightweight replicas that can predict cooling performance instantly without requiring full CFD computations, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs comprehensive CFD simulations and data collection in advance to train the machine learning models. This preliminary action creates a pre-computed knowledge base that enables real-time control decisions without requiring lengthy CFD runs during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If traditional CFD-based adaptive control is implemented, then cooling performance is optimized, but computational intensity makes it impractical for active control processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling control responsivenessVSAvoidcomputational power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical CFD computation system with a machine learning-based prediction system. The trained ML models perform rapid inference using minimal computational resources, substituting the heavy CFD mechanical computation process with a lightweight algorithmic approach that enables real-time control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses inexpensive, computationally lightweight ML models that can be rapidly deployed and retrained compared to expensive CFD simulations. These simpler models consume far less computational power while providing sufficient accuracy for control applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If detailed CFD modeling is performed for each subsystem, then adaptive operation capability is achieved, but the complexity and time required make it impractical for data center scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubsystem adaptive operation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a universal machine learning framework that can be applied across multiple subsystems (cooling, power distribution, compute racks) with a single modeling approach. This universal method maintains adaptability across different data center configurations without requiring separate complex CFD models for each subsystem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the data center into manageable zones or subsystems and applies the ML modeling approach to each segment independently. This segmentation allows adaptive control to be implemented at appropriate scales without overwhelming computational complexity, enabling parallel processing and reduced model size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8630967B2Determining operational settings for fluid moving devices using a multivariate time series of data
Publication Date: 2014.01.14 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US8630967B2 patent drawing
  • US8630967B2 patent drawing
  • US8630967B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method for determining operational settings for a plurality of fluid moving devices, one or more motifs in utilization data of the plurality of fluid moving devices collected over a time series is identified as a multivariate time series of data, sustainability metric levels for each of the one or more identified motifs are calculated, and a determination as to which of the one or more identified motifs have favorable sustainability metric levels is made.