Fluid Pressure Control Device for Analyzer Gas Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gas calibration systems for chemical analyzers, such as blood gas analyzers, face issues with high shipping costs due to hazardous pressurized fluid canisters, excessive waste of gas due to mechanical pressure regulators, and high maintenance costs, particularly because they require refrigeration and liquid mixing systems, which increase complexity and error sources.

Innovation Solution

A fluid pressure control device that uses a pressurized fluid inlet, valves, and pressure measurement devices to maintain a substantially constant pressure, eliminating the need for mechanical pressure regulators by employing a two-way and three-way valve system with an electronic controller to manage gas flow from a lower-pressure canister, ensuring efficient gas usage and reducing waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If mechanical pressure regulators are used to control gas pressure, then gas pressure can be maintained within desired range, but system cost increases and gas is wasted due to CO2 diffusion and minimum pressure requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas pressure controlVSAvoidgas waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical pressure regulator with an electronic pressure control system consisting of a solenoid valve, electronic controller, and pressure sensor. The electronic system precisely controls pressure by opening/closing the solenoid valve based on real-time pressure feedback, eliminating the need for mechanical regulators and their associated CO2 diffusion losses through seal diaphragms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback control mechanism where a pressure sensor continuously monitors the pressure downstream of the solenoid valve, and the electronic controller adjusts the solenoid valve opening based on the difference between actual and target pressure. This closed-loop feedback system maintains stable pressure while preventing gas waste by avoiding the minimum pressure thresholds required by mechanical regulators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stress or pressure

If mechanical pressure regulators are used, then pressure control is achieved, but shipping costs increase due to hazardous goods classification at high pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating pressure parameter from high pressure (exceeding 30 psi) to low pressure (below 30 psi) by using a pressure reducing valve and electronic control system. This parameter change allows the system to maintain adequate pressure for calibration while avoiding hazardous goods classification, thereby reducing shipping costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stress or pressure

If mechanical pressure regulators are used, then pressure regulation is achieved, but maintenance requirements increase due to periodic purging and CO2 diffusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure regulationVSAvoidmaintenance requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical pressure regulator with an electronic control system using a solenoid valve and electronic controller. This substitution eliminates the mechanical seals and diaphragms that cause CO2 diffusion and require periodic purging, thereby reducing maintenance requirements while maintaining pressure regulation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Stress or pressure

If high-pressure canisters are used, then gas supply pressure is sufficient, but shipping costs approach or exceed the cost of the canister itself

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas supply pressureVSAvoidshipping cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pressure parameter from high pressure to low pressure operation. By using a pressure reducing valve and electronic control, the system can deliver sufficient pressure for calibration from low-pressure canisters, making the canister cost significantly lower than high-pressure alternatives while avoiding hazardous shipping classifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces shipping costs, minimizes gas waste, and lowers maintenance requirements by maintaining a stable pressure range (2-5 psi) using a more cost-effective and simpler system, thereby improving the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of gas calibration for chemical analyzers.

Implementation Method 1

a first pressure measurement device detecting a fluid pressure downstream of the first valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure detection:

Implementation Method 2

The first valve may be a solenoid valve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid actuation: Solenoid

Data Source

PatentUS9151731B2Fluid pressure control device for an analyzer
Publication Date: 2015.10.06 OPTI MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC
  • US9151731B2 patent drawing
  • US9151731B2 patent drawing
  • US9151731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluid pressure control device, including a pressurized fluid inlet, a first valve in fluid communication with the pressurized fluid inlet and controlling the flow of fluid from the pressurized fluid inlet, a first pressure measurement device detecting a fluid pressure downstream of the first valve, and a controller electrically coupled to the first valve. The first pressure measurement device causes the controller to operate the first valve such that a fluid downstream of the first valve is maintained at a substantially constant pressure.