Fluid Sample Quality Quantification via Pressure History Reconstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current well/formation testing methods face challenges in obtaining high-quality fluid samples due to contamination from mud filtrates and unwanted phase changes during sampling, as the pressure history of fluid samples is complex and difficult to quantify accurately.

Innovation Solution

A method to quantify fluid sample quality by measuring bottom-hole pressure, obtaining formation properties, reconstructing the pressure history of fluid samples, and determining if the pressure has dropped below the bubble or dew point, using integrated simulation models of fluid transport in the reservoir and wellbore, and tracking the pressure history of fluid parcels from the formation to the sampler.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wireline formation tester is used to take fluid samples, then real-time pressure monitoring and single phase sampling capability are improved, but mud filtrate contamination is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle phase sampling capabilityVSAvoidmud filtrate contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the fluid sampling process into distinct stages: initial filtrate removal phase and subsequent formation fluid sampling phase. The system segments the flowline into different functional zones and uses sequential pumping operations to first clear mud filtrates, then capture representative formation fluids, thereby resolving the contradiction between maintaining single-phase conditions and avoiding contamination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary action by conducting a pre-sampling pumpout operation to remove mud filtrates before actual formation fluid sampling. This preliminary step ensures that the flowline is cleared of contaminants, allowing subsequent samples to be free from mud filtrate contamination while maintaining the pressure control capabilities of the WFT

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If Drill Stem Test is used to take fluid samples, then mud filtrate contamination is reduced, but real-time pressure monitoring and phase change control are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemud filtrate contaminationVSAvoidpressure control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies feedback by continuously monitoring bottom-hole pressure during the DST operation and using this information to control flow rates and maintain pressure above bubble or dew point. This real-time feedback loop enables the system to achieve both low contamination (like DST) and pressure control (like WFT) by adjusting operational parameters based on measured pressure conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If flow rate is reduced to maintain pressure above bubble point, then single phase sampling is improved, but sampling time is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle phase samplingVSAvoidsampling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies partial action by using reduced flow rates only during critical sampling intervals when pressure control is essential, rather than maintaining low flow rates throughout the entire operation. This allows the system to achieve single-phase sampling during sample capture while minimizing the time penalty, by switching to higher flow rates during non-critical phases like initial pumpout or between samples

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate quantification of fluid sample quality, ensuring representative samples by reconstructing the pressure history and identifying phase changes, thereby improving the reliability of reservoir fluid properties and management.

Implementation Method 1

an optical density sensor, as described in the U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,994,671, 5,266,800 and 6,966,234, may be used to distinguish the filtrates and formation fluids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical density measurement: Absorption Spectroscopy

Implementation Method 2

Gas vaporization or condensates drop out when the fluid pressure goes below the bubble or dew point, leading to phase change in the fluid samples

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Data Source

PatentUS8020437B2Method and apparatus to quantify fluid sample quality
Publication Date: 2011.09.20 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US8020437B2 patent drawing
  • US8020437B2 patent drawing
  • US8020437B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to fluid sampling in a test that is used to determine physical and chemical characteristics of the fluids in a subterranean reservoir. The method reconstructs the entire pressure history of the fluid parcel that is captured in the fluid samplers during a test. Using this reconstructed pressure history of the samples, the quality of the samples, particularly, whether there is a phase change in the samples during the test, can be accurately quantified.