Fluid Treatment System for Polymer Matrix Modification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for improving the physical, chemical, and structural properties of materials, such as polymer composites, often require the addition of reinforcement particles, which complicates the manufacturing process and increases costs. Additionally, these methods struggle to achieve high enough shear rates and hydrostatic pressures to fully delaminate or disentangle reinforcement particles like graphene or carbon nanotubes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize upper kinematic pairs with mechanical elements in contact with a material in a fluid state, applying high relative velocities and contact pressures to generate extremely high hydrodynamic pressures and shear rates, effectively delaminating, disentangling, and fragmenting particles without the need for reinforcement particles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If reinforcement particles are added to improve material properties, then physical and structural properties are improved, but manufacturing complexity and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the reinforcement particles from the composite material system, treating only the matrix material with high shear rates and hydrostatic pressures. This removes the need for adding separate reinforcement components while still achieving improved material properties through direct modification of the matrix material structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies extreme parameter conditions (high shear rates up to 10^9 s^-1 and hydrostatic pressures up to 6 GPa) to the matrix material to fundamentally change its physical and structural properties. These parameter changes enable the matrix material itself to achieve enhanced strength and performance characteristics without requiring reinforcement particles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional mixing methods are used, then manufacturing process is simple, but shear rates and hydrostatic pressures are insufficient to delaminate or disentangle reinforcement particles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidparticle delamination quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces conventional mechanical mixing systems with a high-pressure homogenization system that generates extreme shear rates and hydrostatic pressures. This substitution enables complete delamination and disentanglement of reinforcement particles (when used) or fundamental restructuring of the matrix material, achieving manufacturing precision that conventional methods cannot attain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention dramatically changes the operating parameters from conventional mixing conditions to extreme conditions with shear rates up to 10^9 s^-1 and hydrostatic pressures up to 6 GPa. These parameter changes enable complete delamination of stacked sheets and full disentanglement of linear nanoparticles, achieving the manufacturing precision required for high-performance composites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If high shear rates and hydrostatic pressures are applied to delaminate reinforcement particles, then particle dispersion quality improves, but the need for reinforcement particles increases production costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle dispersion qualityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the reinforcement particles from the system, applying the high shear rates and hydrostatic pressures directly to the matrix material. This achieves the desired dispersion quality and structural improvement without the need to purchase and process expensive reinforcement particles like carbon nanotubes or graphene.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention enables the matrix material to self-organize and self-structure under extreme shear rates and hydrostatic pressures, creating improved physical and structural properties intrinsically. The material serves itself to achieve the enhancement that would otherwise require expensive reinforcement particles, eliminating the need for external reinforcement additives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves significantly higher shear rates (up to 10^9 s^-1) and hydrostatic pressures (up to 6 GPa) than existing methods, leading to improved properties such as rigidity, strength, fracture energy, electrical, and thermal conductivity in polymer materials without the addition of reinforcement particles.

Implementation Method 1

applying high relative velocities and contact pressures to generate extremely high hydrodynamic pressures and shear rates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

generate extremely high hydrodynamic pressures and shear rates, effectively delaminating, disentangling, and fragmenting particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear rate: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentUS12233387B2Method and system for the treatment of materials
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 UNIV MADRID POLITECNICA
  • US12233387B2 patent drawing
  • US12233387B2 patent drawing
  • US12233387B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for the treatment of materials, to be selected from between materials in a fluid state (1) and particles suspended in a fluid material (1), comprising at least one upper kinematic pair equipped with two mechanical elements (2a, 2b; 2a, 2c), said kinematic pair being in contact with a material in a fluid state (1) or with particles suspended in a fluid material (1); motor means (5) to generate a pre-set relative velocity (v) between the elements (2a, 2b; 2a, 2c) of said kinematic pair, and tensioning means (8) to subject said kinematic pair to a pre-set pressure (P).