Fluid-Optimized Tuning Fork Resonator With Acoustic Energy Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical resonators, such as quartz tuning forks, suffer from significant energy losses due to viscous friction and acoustic coupling when used in fluid environments, which limits their sensitivity and quality factor in applications like chemical element detection.

Innovation Solution

A resonator design with optimized dimensions and geometry, specifically a prong width that facilitates acoustic coupling and reduced viscous friction, combined with a resonant acoustic cavity to restore acoustic energy, enhancing the quality factor by minimizing energy losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a conventional quartz tuning fork resonator is used in a fluid environment, then it can detect chemical elements, but significant energy losses occur due to viscous friction and acoustic coupling, limiting the quality factor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy lossesVSAvoidquality factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the resonator, specifically optimizing the prong width Wb relative to the acoustic wavelength λ. By setting Wb between λ/10 and λ/5, the resonator achieves optimal acoustic coupling while minimizing viscous friction losses, thereby improving the quality factor in fluid environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a resonant acoustic cavity that dynamically interacts with the resonator. The cavity is designed with dimensions resonant at the same frequency as the mechanical resonator, creating a coupled acoustic-mechanical system that reduces energy losses through constructive interference and energy recycling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of energy

If the prong width is reduced to minimize viscous friction, then energy losses decrease, but acoustic coupling efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviscous friction lossesVSAvoidacoustic coupling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies the optimal prong width parameter Wb as being between λ/10 and λ/5, where λ is the acoustic wavelength. This specific parameter range balances viscous friction minimization with acoustic coupling efficiency, resolving the contradiction between these two competing requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the resonator is designed with optimized dimensions for acoustic coupling, then sensitivity improves, but the design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesensitivityVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent provides specific dimensional parameters (prong width Wb between λ/10 and λ/5, cavity dimensions resonant at the mechanical frequency) that achieve optimal sensitivity. While these specifications add design constraints, they provide clear guidance for manufacturing and simplify the optimization process compared to trial-and-error approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized resonator design achieves a higher quality factor by minimizing energy losses, improving sensitivity and performance in detecting chemical elements in fluid environments.

Implementation Method 1

an acoustic coupling related to pressure variations of the fluid which are generated by the motion of the prongs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic coupling: Sound

Implementation Method 2

the two prongs vibrate in phase opposition by bending in the plane of the plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 3

it has a natural frequency of acoustic resonance equal to the natural frequency of mechanical resonance of the tuning fork

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic resonance: Resonance

Implementation Method 4

losses appear which are related to the viscous friction of the prongs with the fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous friction: Viscous Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10809230B2Mechanical resonator optimised to operate in a fluid
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 OFFICE NAT DETUDES & DE RECH AEROSPATIALES
  • US10809230B2 patent drawing
  • US10809230B2 patent drawing
  • US10809230B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A resonator includes a prong of which the width between edges is close to λ/2. The pressure variation at one edge is then in phase opposition with that at the other edge. Acoustic coupling with an incident wave having the wavelength is thus improved. The ratio between the width between edges and the height of the prong is chosen so that only the fundamental mode with bending oscillation of the prong is present. It to prongs of a tuning fork embedded in a solid shared base optimized to contain the energy in the tuning fork while avoiding energy losses in the support. Finally, the tuning fork is advantageously combined with a unit for containing acoustic energy including a rigid reflecting screen.