Fluidized Bed Reactor Segmentation for Syngas Ash Agglomeration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for generating synthesis gas from carbonaceous materials in fluidized bed reactors face issues with ash and educt material sticking, leading to inefficient operation and uneconomical use, especially when using softening-critical starting materials.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage heating method is employed in a fluidized bed reactor, where a first pyrolysis gasification step occurs at a lower temperature below the ash softening point, followed by a second gasification step at a higher temperature, allowing for reduced agglomeration and further conversion of pyrolysis gases, while also reducing tar content in the synthesis gas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single high-temperature gasification step is used, then gasification efficiency is improved, but ash agglomeration and sticking increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegasification efficiencyVSAvoidash agglomeration and sticking
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gasification process is divided into two distinct temperature zones: a first fluidized bed zone operating at 700-800°C for initial gasification, and a second fluidized bed zone operating at over 1100°C for complete conversion. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally while avoiding the harmful effects of high temperature in the first zone

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different temperature conditions are applied to different spatial locations within the reactor. The first zone maintains a lower temperature suitable for initial gasification without causing ash softening, while the second zone provides the high temperature needed for complete gasification. This local differentiation of thermal conditions resolves the contradiction between efficiency and agglomeration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple temperature zones are used, then ash agglomeration is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveash agglomerationVSAvoidreactor structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Two fluidized bed zones with different temperature zones are combined within a single reactor vessel. The zones are arranged vertically with the first zone at the bottom and the second zone above it, sharing common structural elements and fluidization systems. This merging approach achieves the benefit of reduced agglomeration while minimizing the increase in device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient gasification of 50% to 80% of starting materials with reduced tar content and improved reactor efficiency by maintaining a homogeneous gasification temperature and utilizing allothermic and autothermal energy inputs across multiple temperature zones.

Implementation Method 1

a first pyrolysis gasification step at the first, lower gasification temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

gasification in a fluidised bed reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 3

The residual and lighter reactant particles remaining after the pyrolysis step are carried upwards through the fluidized bed into the second reactor housing section and then gasified

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGasification:

Implementation Method 4

utilizing allothermic and autothermal energy inputs across multiple temperature zones

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAllothermic heating:

Implementation Method 5

utilizing allothermic and autothermal energy inputs across multiple temperature zones

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAutothermal heating:

Implementation Method 6

The residual and lighter reactant particles remaining after the pyrolysis step are carried upwards through the fluidized bed into the second reactor housing section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2705121B1Method and device for producing syngas from reactants which contain carbon, by means of gasification in a fluidised bed reactor
Publication Date: 2018.05.02 SCHMITT ROLF
  • EP2705121B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2705121B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2705121B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

To produce syngas from reactants that contain carbon, by means of gasification in a fluidised bed reactor (2), firstly a first, low-lying fluidised bed region (7) of the fluidised bed reactor (2) is heated to a first gasification temperature by an external supply of energy. This low-lying fluidised bed region (7) is received in a first, low-lying fluidised bed housing section (4) of a housing (3) of said fluidised bed reactor (2). The first gasification temperature is below a softening temperature of the reactants or their ash, and heating to this first gasification temperature is carried out using a first heating device (12). A second reactor housing section (5), which is higher than the first fluidised bed region, is heated to a second gasification temperature by an external supply of energy, and heating to this second gasification temperature is carried out using a second heating device (18). The reactants are supplied to the first fluidised bed region (7) by means of a supply device (20), and a discharge device (22) is used to discharge the syngas which has been produced. The invention relates to a resulting method and device for producing syngas from reactants that contain carbon, wherein undesired adhesion is reduced or, as far as possible, completely eliminated at standard gasification efficiency, even when using reactants that have critical softening points.