Fluidized Bed Direct Reduction of Fine Iron Particles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fluidized bed processes for direct reduction of oxidic iron-bearing particles face challenges with high reactor area requirements and operational complexity due to small grain sizes, leading to low usable gas velocities and increased discharge of particles, which reduces efficiency and increases construction and safety demands.

Innovation Solution

A process where oxidic iron-bearing particles with at least 90% by mass having a grain size of not more than 200 micrometers are reduced in a fluidized bed with a reduction gas containing 30-100 mol % hydrogen flowing in crosscurrent, with superficial velocities set between 0.05 m/s and 1 m/s, above the theoretical fluidization velocity but not exceeding the maximum velocity, to minimize particle discharge and maintain efficient fluidization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If gas velocity is increased to increase mass flow rate of reduction gas, then productivity is improved, but particle discharge from fluid bed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass flow rate of reduction gasVSAvoidparticle discharge
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the particle size parameter to predominantly fine particles (≤200 μm) and adjusts the gas velocity parameter to a specific range (0.3-1.5 m/s) that maintains fluidization while minimizing discharge. This parameter optimization allows operating at higher gas velocities for improved productivity without excessive particle loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic control of gas velocity within an optimized range rather than using fixed high velocities. The fluidized bed operates in a controlled dynamic state where gas flow is sufficient to maintain suspension and mass transfer but below the point of excessive particle entrainment and discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Area of stationary object

If gas velocity is increased to reduce reactor area, then device complexity is reduced, but particle discharge increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor areaVSAvoidparticle discharge
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By changing the particle size distribution parameter to predominantly fine particles and optimizing the gas velocity parameter, the patent achieves efficient mass transfer at moderate velocities. This allows using a compact reactor design without incurring high particle discharge penalties that would occur at much higher velocities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If small grain size particles are used to increase exchange area, then mass transfer rate is improved, but fluidization velocity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass transfer rateVSAvoidfluidization velocity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the particle size parameter to a specific fine range ( predominantly ≤200 μm) that provides high surface area to volume ratio for enhanced mass transfer. Concurrently, the gas velocity parameter is adjusted to an optimized range that maintains proper fluidization of these fine particles, balancing mass transfer enhancement with adequate fluidization velocity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for higher gas velocities than expected, reducing particle discharge and maintaining efficient fluidization, thereby lowering reactor area needs and operational complexity while achieving high metallization levels of the reduction product, thus enhancing the economic viability and safety of the process.

Implementation Method 1

reduction gas flow is counter to gravity through solid-state particles—i.e. the oxidic iron-bearing particles, for example bulk iron ore material. This puts the solid-state particles in a fluidized, i.e. suspended, state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 2

on account of the high exchange area present between the solid state and gas, comparatively high mass and heat transfer rates are achieved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass transfer: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

on account of the high exchange area present between the solid state and gas, comparatively high mass and heat transfer rates are achieved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Convection

Implementation Method 4

direct reduction of oxidic iron-bearing particles to a reduction product in a fluidized bed through which a reduction gas containing 30-100 mol % of hydrogen H2 flows

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction reaction: Reduction

Implementation Method 5

comparatively high mass and heat transfer rates are achieved. This correspondingly results in high specific conversion rates in the reduction reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Transport Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS11685961B2Method for direct reduction in a fluidized bed
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 PRIMETALS TECH AUSTRIA GMBH
  • US11685961B2 patent drawing
  • US11685961B2 patent drawing
  • US11685961B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for the direct reduction of oxidic iron carrier particles to a reduction product in a fluidized bed through which a reduction gas containing 30-100 mol % hydrogen H2 flows in crossflow. At least 90% by mass of oxidic iron carrier particles introduced into the fluidized bed have a particle size of less than or equal to 200 micrometers. The superficial velocity U of the reduction gas flowing through the fluidized bed is set between 0.05 m/s and 1 m/s such that, for the particle size d equal to d30 of the oxidic iron carrier particles introduced into the fluidized bed, it is above the theoretical suspension velocity Ut and is less than or equal to Umax.