Fluorescence Intensity Compensation Using Non-Negative Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fluorescence intensity compensation methods in multi-color measurements can result in errors due to negative intensity values and variations in autofluorescence among subpopulations, leading to inaccurate plotting in two-dimensional correlation diagrams.

Innovation Solution

A method that computes fluorescence intensities by approximating the measured spectrum with a linear sum of simple staining and autofluorescence spectra, using a least-squares method and imposing constraints to ensure non-negative intensity values, thereby preventing measurement errors and accurately representing population sizes in cytograms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fluorescence compensation is performed using a compensation matrix with negative values allowed, then the mathematical compensation can be applied, but the computed fluorescence intensity may become negative which is physically impossible and causes measurement errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluorescence intensity measurement accuracyVSAvoidphysical validity of intensity values
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter space from allowing negative values to constraining values to be non-negative. By introducing non-negativity constraints on the fluorescence intensity parameters during the compensation calculation, the method ensures physically valid results while maintaining measurement precision through constrained optimization techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If the same average autofluorescence value is subtracted from all populations, then the compensation process is simplified, but measurement errors increase due to variations in autofluorescence among subpopulations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation process simplicityVSAvoidfluorescence intensity measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the population into distinct subpopulations and calculates separate average autofluorescence values for each subpopulation. This segmentation allows the method to account for autofluorescence variations among different cell types or states, thereby improving measurement precision while maintaining computational feasibility through structured processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by calculating and using subpopulation-specific autofluorescence values rather than a single global average. Each subpopulation receives customized compensation based on its specific autofluorescence characteristics, improving measurement accuracy for heterogeneous samples while keeping the overall process manageable through systematic organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If negative fluorescence intensity values are produced, then the compensation calculation is straightforward, but the population size in two-dimensional correlation diagrams is misrepresented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidpopulation size accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter domain from negative to non-negative values for fluorescence intensities. By implementing non-negativity constraints during compensation calculation, the method ensures that population sizes represented in two-dimensional correlation diagrams remain accurate and physically meaningful, preventing information loss while maintaining efficient computation through constrained optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures accurate computation of fluorescence intensities for each fluorochrome and autofluorescence, preventing errors caused by negative values and autofluorescence variations, and providing a more accurate representation of microparticle populations in multi-color measurements.

Implementation Method 1

emits a laser beam onto the fluorochrome to excite the fluorochrome, and measures the intensity or pattern of the fluorescence emitted from the excited fluorochrome

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Implementation Method 2

receiving fluorescence generated by the excited fluorochromes using photodetectors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS8581210B2Fluorescence intensity compensation method and fluorescence intensity computing apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.11.12 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US8581210B2 patent drawing
  • US8581210B2 patent drawing
  • US8581210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fluorescence intensity compensation method includes emitting light onto microparticles multiply labeled with a plurality of fluorochromes having fluorescence wavelength ranges that overlap each other in order to excite the fluorochromes and receiving fluorescence generated by the excited fluorochromes using photodetectors having different reception wavelength ranges, and computing fluorescence intensities of the fluorochromes by compensating detection values of the photodetectors under a predetermined constraint condition imposed on the computed fluorescence intensities.