Fluorinated Catalyst Supports for Polyolefin Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The commercialization of single site catalysts for polyolefin production is hindered by the high cost and large amounts of activators like methylaluminoxane required, and scaling up fluorinated alumina supports leads to issues with filter plugging, chip formation, and reduced fluorine levels in the final product.

Innovation Solution

A catalyst system is developed using a fluorinated support generated by heating a catalyst support and a fluoride donor in a fluidized bed reactor with a specific height-to-diameter ratio, and an aluminoxane compound present in limited amounts, along with strategies to reduce chip formation such as impregnating fluoride sources into the support and using smaller particle sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a large amount of activator such as methylaluminoxane is used to achieve acceptable polymerization activities with single site catalyst systems, then catalyst productivity is improved, but cost increases and economic viability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymerization activityVSAvoidamount of activator
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the catalyst support by introducing fluorine atoms at specific sites, changing the chemical parameters of the support to enhance its ability to activate the catalyst compound. This fluorinated support enables achieving acceptable polymerization activities with significantly reduced amounts of activator, thereby resolving the contradiction between productivity and activator quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If fluorinated alumina supports are scaled up in production, then fluorine levels in the final product are improved, but filter plugging and chip formation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluorine levelsVSAvoidfilter plugging
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing fluorine atoms at specific, controlled sites on the catalyst support rather than uniformly throughout. This localized fluorination approach, achieved through specific reaction conditions and support modification techniques, allows for high fluorine levels in the final product while minimizing the formation of chips and filter plugging issues that arise from bulk fluorination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical mixing and bulk fluorination methods with chemical modification approaches. Instead of mechanically mixing fluorine sources throughout the support material, the invention uses chemical reactions to introduce fluorine at specific sites, thereby achieving precise fluorine levels without the mechanical stress and chip formation associated with bulk processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If fluorinated alumina supports are scaled up, then production capacity is improved, but chip formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capacityVSAvoidchip formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the support by introducing fluorine atoms at specific sites, which modifies the structural integrity and reduces chip formation during scaling up. This chemical modification enables higher production capacity while maintaining lower chip formation rates compared to conventional fluorination methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases catalyst productivity by enhancing the transition metal component concentration, reduces filter plugging, and maintains high fluorine levels in the product, facilitating more efficient and scalable polyolefin production.

Implementation Method 1

heating a catalyst support and a fluoride donor compound at a temperature sufficient to decompose the fluoride donor compound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 2

forming a fluorinated support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorination: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

The mixture is fluidized to form a fluidized bed with a height to diameter ratio of at least about 2.3

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Data Source

PatentUS10189917B2Fluorinated catalyst supports and catalyst systems
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 UNIVATION TECH LLC
  • US10189917B2 patent drawing
  • US10189917B2 patent drawing
  • US10189917B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Catalyst systems and methods for making and using the same. A method for making a catalyst support includes forming a mixture of a support material and a fluoride donor. The mixture is added to a fluidized bed reactor. The mixture is fluidized to form a fluidized bed with a height to diameter ratio of at least about 2.3. The mixture is calcined to decompose the fluoride donor, forming a fluorinated support.