Fluoropolymer UV Laser Marking Material

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fluoropolymers used in cable coatings are not reactive to ultraviolet lasers, requiring additives like titanium dioxide for marking, but these additives result in low contrast and are prone to blistering due to degradation during the sintering process, and other additives cause arcing and blisters.

Innovation Solution

A fluoropolymer-based material with a pigment additive reactive to ultraviolet lasers in the range of 0.5% to 1.2% by weight and an organic polyimide additive in the range of 0.05% to 0.5% by weight, such as P84 polyimide, is used to absorb laser energy and reduce blistering, with preferred pigments like cadmium or cerium sulfides.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If titanium dioxide pigment is used as additive in fluoropolymer for ultraviolet laser marking, then the material becomes markable, but the marking contrast remains low (50-65%)

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemarkabilityVSAvoidmarking contrast
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by replacing titanium dioxide with organic polyimide additives having specific molecular structures (containing aromatic rings and imide groups). This parameter change transforms the marking mechanism from physical pigment reduction to chemical carbonization, achieving high contrast markings (70-85%) while maintaining processability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material system combining fluoropolymer base material with organic polyimide additives. This composite approach integrates the non-reactive fluoropolymer matrix with reactive polyimide components, enabling both processability and high-contrast laser marking functionality simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If aromatic polymer additives are used to increase marking contrast to 70%, then high contrast is achieved, but the material undergoes significant degradation during sintering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking contrastVSAvoidmaterial stability during sintering
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using low concentrations of polyimide additives (0.1-1.0 wt%) specifically targeted for laser marking functionality, while the bulk fluoropolymer matrix (99-98.9 wt%) maintains its thermal stability and compositional integrity during sintering. This localized approach ensures high contrast marking without compromising overall material stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a small, controlled amount of polyimide additive (0.1-1.0 wt%) - a partial action approach - which is sufficient to enable high-contrast laser marking while being minimal enough to avoid significant material degradation during sintering. This optimized dosage balances marking performance with material stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If high concentration of additives is used to improve marking contrast, then contrast increases, but extrusion pressure becomes unstable and defects form

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking contrastVSAvoidextrusion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the additive concentration parameter to a specific range (0.1-1.0 wt%) that balances two competing requirements: sufficient concentration for high-contrast marking (requiring adequate laser-reactive material) and low enough concentration to maintain stable extrusion pressure and avoid processing defects. This precise parameter control resolves the contradiction between marking quality and manufacturing stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves high contrast and legible markings without blistering, maintaining material integrity and stability during the ultraviolet laser marking process.

Implementation Method 1

an organic additive capable of partly absorbing the energy coming from the laser, to reduce the effect of the laser on the pigment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption (EM radiation): Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

The marking of titanium dioxide is based on the reduction reaction under the effect of the ultraviolet laser

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction reaction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentEP1741749B1Ultraviolet laser-markable material based on fluoropolymer
Publication Date: 2010.09.15 AXONCABLE
  • EP1741749B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP1741749B1 patent drawing
  • EP1741749B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Material having UV laser marking ability based on fluoropolymer comprises a reactive pigment (having UV laser marking ability) at >=0.5 wt.% or =1.2 wt.%; and an organic additive e.g. polyimide at >=0.05 wt.% or less than 0.5 wt.%. An INDEPENEDNT CLAIM is included for a cable coating comprising the material.