Fluoroscopy Exposure Control for Low-Dose Image Restoration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fluoroscopy systems face challenges in achieving optimal image quality due to low exposure doses, which complicates downstream image denoising and restoration processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a neural network to identify informative frames and adjust exposure parameters dynamically, using a trained model to optimize dose, frame rate, and other settings based on object movement and changes during procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If low exposure dose is used during fluoroscopy procedures, then radiation exposure to patient is reduced, but image quality deteriorates and downstream image denoising/restoration processes are hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation exposureVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by acquiring a first X-ray image at a first exposure dose level before the fluoroscopy procedure begins. This preliminary image is then used to train neural network models that can optimize subsequent exposure parameters, allowing the system to prepare optimal imaging parameters in advance rather than adjusting them reactively during the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts exposure parameters (mA, ms, kV, filters) frame-by-frame during fluoroscopy based on real-time image analysis. The neural network models continuously optimize the exposure dose for each frame based on image content, allowing the system to adapt the radiation dose dynamically to minimize exposure while maintaining optimal image quality for denoising and restoration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If fixed exposure parameters are used throughout fluoroscopy procedure, then system operation is simplified, but image quality cannot be optimized for different frames

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operationVSAvoidimage quality optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing image content and optimizing exposure parameters without manual intervention. The neural network models process each frame's image data and autonomously determine optimal exposure parameters (mA, ms, kV, filters), eliminating the need for operator intervention while achieving frame-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using the first X-ray image and subsequent frame images as input to train neural network models that generate optimized exposure parameters. The output of each frame's image analysis feeds back into the parameter optimization process, creating a closed-loop system that continuously improves exposure settings based on actual image quality and content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12632915B2Method of adjusting acquisition parameters in a fluoroscopy system
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 CANON KK
  • US12632915B2 patent drawing
  • US12632915B2 patent drawing
  • US12632915B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of imaging includes obtaining a sequence of X-ray images including a first X-ray image and a second X-ray image, the first and second X-ray images being acquired sequentially using a first set of exposure parameters of an image scanning apparatus; inputting the first and second X-ray images into a trained first model to obtain a second set of exposure parameters, which is output from the trained first model; obtaining a third X-ray image acquired by the image scanning apparatus using the second set of exposure parameters; inputting at least the second X-ray image and the third X-ray image into a trained second model to obtain a restored X-ray third image, which is output from the trained second model; and outputting the restored X-ray third image, wherein the first model and the second model were trained together using a training sequence of images in a training process.