Flutter Detection Sensor for Gas Turbine Fan Blades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Gas turbine engine fan blades experience structural damping insufficiency leading to vibrational frequencies that can cause flutter, resulting in high-cycle fatigue and potential failures due to insufficient damping of aerodynamic energy.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for monitoring fan blades using pressure sensors capable of measuring dynamic frequencies beyond the third fundamental frequency, employing time-frequency analysis such as Fourier or wavelet transforms to detect shifts in power levels, which indicate susceptibility to flutter conditions, and outputting an indicating signal to adjust engine operating conditions and mitigate risk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the speed of inlet air across the fan blade increases, then the power and performance of the gas turbine engine increases, but the structural damping becomes insufficient to damp out vibrational frequencies, leading to flutter

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepowerVSAvoidstructural damping
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of flutter susceptibility by monitoring pressure signals and analyzing frequency shifts before actual flutter occurs. The controller identifies impending flutter conditions through time-frequency analysis and issues warnings or adjusts operating parameters proactively, preventing the harmful phenomenon before it damages the fan blade structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors pressure signals from sensors on the fan blade, performs time-frequency analysis to detect changes in vibrational characteristics, and provides feedback to the controller. This closed-loop feedback enables real-time detection of flutter susceptibility and allows for dynamic adjustment of engine operating conditions to maintain structural damping effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If conventional monitoring systems are used, then the device complexity is low, but the measurement precision is insufficient to detect flutter conditions at high speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces conventional mechanical vibration sensors with pressure sensors that measure aerodynamic pressure fluctuations. These pressure signals are then processed through time-frequency analysis methods (such as Fast Fourier Transform or Wavelet Transform) to extract vibrational characteristics. This substitution enables higher measurement precision for detecting flutter susceptibility while keeping the physical sensor system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the measurement parameter from direct mechanical vibration displacement to pressure signal analysis. By monitoring pressure fluctuations and transforming them through time-frequency analysis, the system can detect frequency shifts and power level changes that indicate flutter susceptibility. This parameter transformation enables detection at higher speeds where conventional mechanical sensors would be insufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively identifies flutter susceptibility by analyzing frequency shifts, allowing for proactive adjustments to prevent vibrations and noise, thereby extending the life of fan blades and preventing failures.

Implementation Method 1

Flutter is a phenomenon encountered in flexible structures subjected to aerodynamic forces. Flutter may occur as a result of interactions between aerodynamics, stiffness, and inertial forces on a structure.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

The performing the time frequency analysis may include at least one of performing a Fourier transform, a wavelet transform, a bilinear time frequency distribution, or a modified Wigner distribution function.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFourier transform:

Data Source

PatentEP3901420B1Flutter detection sensor
Publication Date: 2024.05.08 RTX CORP
  • EP3901420B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3901420B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3901420B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems and methods for monitoring aerostructures are provided. In various embodiments, a method for monitoring an aerostructure may include: receiving a signal from a pressure sensor (192, 193), the pressure sensor (192, 193) located downstream from the aerostructure; performing a time frequency analysis on the signal to calculate a power level over a range of frequencies; monitoring the power level over the range of frequencies; and determining a susceptibility to a flutter condition based on the monitoring the power level.