Flutter-Resistant Caster Assembly With Biased Rotational Damping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Vehicles equipped with casters tend to experience flutter, which causes them to veer off course or slow down due to excessive rotation of the caster about the caster stem axis, and existing solutions fail to effectively resist this without inhibiting steering.

Innovation Solution

A flutter-resistant caster design featuring a caster stem with a biasing element, such as coned disc springs, and a locking element that applies a torque force to inhibit rotation while allowing steering, utilizing a combination of bearings and a bushing to minimize friction and stabilize the caster's movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking element with biasing element is added to inhibit caster rotation, then flutter resistance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflutter resistanceVSAvoidcaster structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element and biasing element are nested within the caster housing chamber, with the biasing element positioned between the locking element and the caster stem flange. This nesting arrangement allows the flutter resistance mechanism to be integrated into the existing caster structure without significantly increasing external complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The biasing element acts as an intermediary between the locking element and the caster stem, providing controlled rotational resistance. The coned disc spring biasing element transmits force from the locking element to inhibit excessive caster rotation while allowing normal steering movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a biasing element is used to apply force on the bearing, then rotational resistance is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational resistanceVSAvoidbearing and biasing element alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing element uses coned disc springs with specific geometric parameters (cone angle, thickness, material properties) to provide the required rotational resistance. By carefully selecting these parameters, the system achieves reliable flutter resistance while accommodating reasonable manufacturing tolerances in the bearing and housing assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the locking element is made rotationally fixed to the caster stem, then flutter resistance is improved, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecaster stabilityVSAvoidsteering maneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element is designed to be transitionable between unlocked and locked conditions. In the unlocked condition, the locking element is rotatable relative to the caster stem, allowing easy operation and steering. When activated, it transitions to a locked condition where it becomes rotationally fixed to provide flutter resistance. The biasing element maintains controlled pressure to inhibit excessive rotation while permitting normal steering movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively reduces unwanted caster rotation, maintaining vehicle stability and direction without hindering steering capabilities, by applying controlled friction and rotational resistance through the biasing and locking elements.

Implementation Method 1

The biasing element may include one or more coned disc springs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

utilizing a combination of bearings and a bushing to minimize friction and stabilize the caster's movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12145403B2Flutter resistant caster
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 PRIDE MOBILITY PRODUCTS CORP
  • US12145403B2 patent drawing
  • US12145403B2 patent drawing
  • US12145403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle may include a flutter resistant caster. The vehicle may include a frame, a drive wheel coupled to the frame, a caster housing coupled to the frame, a caster, a locking element, a first bearing, and a biasing element. The caster housing may include an opening. The caster may include a caster wheel and a caster stem extending through the opening in the caster housing. The caster stem may be configured to rotate relative to the caster housing. The locking element may be coupled to the caster stem. The first bearing may be coupled to the caster stem. The biasing element may be coupled to the caster stem. The biasing element may be configured to exert a force on the first bearing.