Flux-Assisted Cu-Cu Bonding at Room Temperature

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Cu—Cu bonding methods in semiconductor manufacturing require high temperatures and pressures, making them unsuitable for bonding wafers or thin chips.

Innovation Solution

A bonding method that generates frictional heat higher than the bonding energy between mechanically interlocked structures, allowing bonding at normal temperature and low pressure by utilizing the frictional heat from these structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thermosonic bonding or thermocompression bonding is used for Cu-Cu bonding, then bonding strength is achieved, but bonding temperature and pressure become excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidbonding temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the bonding parameters from high temperature/pressure to room temperature/low pressure by introducing a flux material that enables low-temperature bonding. The flux material composition and bonding conditions are specifically optimized to achieve strong Cu-Cu bonding without requiring excessive thermal energy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

A flux material is introduced as an intermediary substance between the Cu bumps to facilitate bonding at lower temperatures. The flux material enables metallurgical bonding by removing oxides and impurities, allowing Cu-Cu bonding to occur at room temperature or elevated temperatures below conventional requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If high bonding pressure is applied to achieve Cu-Cu bonding, then bonding reliability is improved, but thin chips and wafers cannot be bonded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding reliabilityVSAvoidapplicability to thin chips
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the pressure parameter from high bonding pressure to low bonding pressure by using flux-assisted bonding. This parameter change enables bonding of thin chips and wafers that would be damaged by conventional high-pressure bonding methods, while still achieving reliable Cu-Cu bonds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The flux material acts as a mediator that reduces the required bonding pressure by enabling chemical bonding mechanisms that do not rely solely on mechanical pressure. This allows thin substrates to be bonded without experiencing damaging stress concentrations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If conventional Cu-Cu bonding methods are used, then bonding is achieved, but surface modification cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding achievementVSAvoidsurface modification cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The flux material serves as a cost-effective intermediary that eliminates the need for expensive surface modification treatments. By applying the flux material directly to the Cu bump surfaces, the invention achieves reliable bonding without requiring additional surface preparation steps that would increase manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and removes the need for expensive surface modification processes by using flux-assisted bonding. The flux material performs the surface preparation function in-situ during bonding, eliminating separate surface treatment steps and their associated costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables bonding of semiconductor devices at normal temperature and low pressure, enhancing the bonding process's efficiency and reliability for wafer-level, chip-level, and system-level applications.

Implementation Method 1

the frictional heat generated by the bonding structures capable of being mutually mechanical interlocked is higher than the bonding energy therebetween

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS9613925B2Method for bonding semiconductor devices on sustrate and bonding structure formed using the same
Publication Date: 2017.04.04 TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY
  • US9613925B2 patent drawing
  • US9613925B2 patent drawing
  • US9613925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a bonding method in semiconductor manufacturing process and a bonding structure formed using the same, which can achieve wafer-level bonding under a condition of normal temperature and low pressure. The bonding method comprises generating bonding structures capable of being mutually mechanical interlocked, wherein the frictional heat generated by the bonding structures capable of being mutually mechanical interlocked is higher than the bonding energy therebetween, and utilizing the frictional heat generated by the bonding structures capable of being mutually mechanical interlocked to bond the bonding structures capable of being mutually mechanical interlocked.