Flux Beamforming via Magnitude Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional beamforming techniques suffer from undesirable side lobes in the rejection zone, frequency-dependent beam shapes, and distortion of on-beam signals, making them inefficient for applications requiring precise beam control, especially in sound and RF frequency ranges.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating flux beams by detecting and processing flux signals using a sensor array, where flux patterns and magnitude patterns are created through signal processing techniques such as Fourier transforms, and these patterns are then combined to form a flux beam that minimizes side lobes and maintains beam shape integrity across frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional phased array beamforming techniques are used, then beam directionality is achieved, but side lobes appear in the rejection zone and on-beam signals are distorted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam directionalityVSAvoidside lobes and signal distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the magnitude information from the flux signals while discarding phase information. By using magnitude patterns instead of complete complex signals, the method eliminates the interference that causes side lobes and phase distortion, achieving clean beamforming without harmful artifacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using the conventional approach of adding phased signals to form beams, the patent inverts the approach by using magnitude patterns that are combined through multiplication in the frequency domain. This reverse methodology fundamentally changes how beamforming is achieved, avoiding the side lobe problem entirely

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If a large number of sensors are used to reduce side lobes, then side lobe levels decrease, but device complexity and sensor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveside lobe levelsVSAvoidsensor array complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of adding more physical sensors with a signal processing substitution. By using magnitude patterns and frequency domain multiplication, the system achieves side lobe reduction through mathematical operations rather than increasing sensor count, significantly reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If phased array techniques are used for broadband sound applications, then beamforming is achieved, but beam shape degrades at higher frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth coverageVSAvoidbeam shape consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter used for beamforming from phase (which is frequency-dependent) to magnitude (which is frequency-independent). By operating in the magnitude domain and using multiplication instead of addition, the beam shape remains consistent across the entire broadband frequency range without degradation at higher frequencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces side lobes, maintains beam shape consistency across frequencies, and improves the precision of beamforming, leading to enhanced performance in applications such as sound and RF signal processing.

Implementation Method 1

A plurality of flux signals may be detected via a sensor array comprising a plurality of sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Generating the plurality of flux magnitude patterns may include processing each of the plurality of flux signals via a Fourier transform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFourier transform:

Implementation Method 3

generating the flux beam includes processing a signal representing the plurality of flux magnitude patterns via an inverse Fourier transform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInverse Fourier transform:

Data Source

PatentUS12328555B2Flux beamforming
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 SOUSA JOSEPH LUIS
  • US12328555B2 patent drawing
  • US12328555B2 patent drawing
  • US12328555B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flux beam is generated as a function of flux magnitude patterns. A plurality of flux signals is detected via a sensor array comprising a plurality of sensors. A plurality of flux patterns is generated based on the plurality of flux signals, each of the plurality of flux patterns representing a respective one of the plurality of flux signals. A plurality of flux magnitude patterns is generated based on the plurality of flux patterns, each of the plurality of flux magnitude patterns representing an absolute value of a respective one of the plurality of flux patterns. A flux beam is then generated as a function of the plurality of flux magnitude patterns.