Fly Ash Carbon Extraction via Electrostatic Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for extracting carbon from fly ash, such as those using electrostatic devices, are inefficient when dealing with wet ash, consume excessive energy, and result in carbon extraction across all granulometry levels, leading to reduced efficacy.

Innovation Solution

A method involving granulometric separation of fly ash into coarse and fine fractions, followed by electrostatic carbon extraction solely on the coarse fraction, with subsequent drying and cooling steps to optimize carbon removal, utilizing a plant with a granulometric separator, electrostatic separator, and grinder to achieve targeted carbon reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If electrostatic device is used to extract carbon from wet fly ash, then carbon extraction is performed, but energy consumption increases significantly and extraction efficacy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon extraction amountVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary drying of fly ash before electrostatic carbon extraction. By removing moisture content to below 10% (preferably below 5%) before the electrostatic separation process, the ash becomes more suitable for effective carbon extraction with reduced energy consumption and improved extraction efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the fly ash processing into distinct stages: drying phase followed by electrostatic separation phase. This segmentation allows optimization of each stage independently, ensuring moisture is removed before carbon extraction to maximize efficacy and minimize energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If electrostatic device extracts carbon from entire fly ash regardless of granularity, then carbon extraction is performed, but extraction efficacy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon extraction amountVSAvoidextraction efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different granulometric fractions of fly ash differently. Coarse fractions (particles larger than 45 micrometers) are subjected to electrostatic carbon extraction, while fine fractions are processed separately or excluded. This targeted approach improves extraction efficacy since carbon particles are predominantly associated with coarse fractions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If fly ash with high carbon concentration is used directly in cement production, then processing cost is reduced, but cement quality degrades and concrete turns black

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing costVSAvoidcement quality and color
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts harmful carbon particles from fly ash through electrostatic separation after drying. By removing carbon content to below 5% (preferably below 3%), the fly ash becomes suitable for cement and concrete applications, eliminating the black discoloration and quality degradation while maintaining cost-effectiveness compared to producing pure cement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances carbon extraction efficacy, reduces energy consumption, and ensures the treated ash meets the requirements of the cement and concrete industry while minimizing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

a step of extracting carbon from the ash, a method wherein the extraction step is subsequent to the separation step, said extraction step being implemented solely on the coarse fraction, by electrostatic separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic separation: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

a step of drying the ash during which the temperature of said ash is above 60° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal drying: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12128422B2Method and facility for treating fly ash
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 FIVES FCB
  • US12128422B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for treating fly ash containing an initial carbon concentration to obtain ash containing a predetermined final carbon concentration less than the initial concentration, the method including: —a step of granulometric separation of the ash into at least two fractions, a coarse traction and a fine fraction, the coarse fraction having a granulometry greater than the fine fraction; —a step of extracting carbon from the ash; a method wherein the extraction step is subsequent to the separation step, the extraction step being implemented solely on the coarse fraction, by electrostatic separation, the method including a step of drying the ash during which the temperature of the ash is above 60° C.