Fly Ash Conditioning for Magnesium Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Raw materials from brown coal power stations, such as fly ash, often contain contaminants like sulfur and iron, which prevent their direct use in reductive pyrometallurgical magnesium production processes like the Pidgeon Process, leading to impure magnesium products unfit for commercial use.

Innovation Solution

A process involving de-sulfation and de-ferration of the raw materials using carbonation agents and complexing agents like triethanolamine, respectively, to reduce sulfur and iron content, creating a conditioned material suitable for pyrometallurgical conversion to magnesium.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If raw fly ash from brown coal power stations is directly used in the Pidgeon Process, then the process can be simplified, but the magnesium product will contain impurities (sulfur and iron) making it unfit for commercial use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidmagnesium purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing de-sulfation and de-ferration treatment steps before the main Pidgeon Process. The fly ash is first treated with carbonation agents to remove sulfur, then with complexing agents to remove iron, preparing the material in advance for successful magnesium production. This preliminary conditioning resolves the contradiction by enabling both process feasibility and product purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts harmful contaminants (sulfur and iron) from the fly ash through selective chemical treatment. De-sulfation removes sulfur compounds, and de-ferration extracts iron using complexing agents like triethanolamine. This extraction of disturbing elements allows the main process to proceed while achieving commercial-grade magnesium purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If de-sulfation and de-ferration treatment steps are added to process fly ash, then magnesium purity is improved, but the process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnesium purityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by adjusting chemical conditions (pH, temperature, reagent concentrations) to control the de-sulfation and de-ferration processes. By optimizing these parameters, the treatment steps become more efficient and easier to manage, reducing the perceived complexity while maintaining high magnesium purity. The systematic control of chemical parameters transforms a complex multi-step process into a manageable sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If conventional calcining is used to convert dolomite-type feedstock to dolime-type form, then magnesium can be produced, but significant energy and cost are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnesium productionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the chemical composition of the feedstock through de-sulfation and de-ferration, creating a conditioned material that requires less energy for the Pidgeon Process. The removal of sulfur and iron impurities changes the thermal and chemical parameters of the reaction, reducing the energy demand compared to conventional dolomite processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful presence of sulfur and iron in fly ash into a benefit by using their removal as a means to create a highly efficient feedstock. The de-sulfation and de-ferration steps, originally intended to eliminate contaminants, inadvertently create a material composition that is more responsive to the Pidgeon Process, reducing energy consumption and improving overall process efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process effectively reduces sulfur and iron levels, enabling the production of high-purity magnesium with recoveries of 70-80% when used in the Pidgeon Process, surpassing the efficiency of high-purity dolime feed materials.

Implementation Method 1

carrying out de-sulfation of the material in a slurry to reduce sulfur content of the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbonation:

Implementation Method 2

carrying out de-ferration of the de-sulfated material in a slurry using a complexing agent to reduce iron content of the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComplexation:

Data Source

PatentEP2609226B1Process for magnesium production
Publication Date: 2018.03.21 ECOENGINEERS
  • EP2609226B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for conditioning material for pyrometallurgical conversion to magnesium, the process comprising carrying out de-su'fation of the material in a slurry to reduce sulfur content of the material; and carrying out de-ferration of the de-sulfated material in a slurry to reduce iron content of the material to produce a conditioned material suitable for pyrometallurgical conversion to magnesium.