Fly Ash PFAS Immobilization in Contaminated Soil

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for stabilizing per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in contaminated soil are economically inefficient and environmentally costly, as they require expensive materials like activated carbon, and existing treatments have uncertainties regarding long-term efficacy and environmental risks associated with landfill disposal.

Innovation Solution

The use of fly ash or air pollution control residues (APCRs) from biomass or waste combustion, treated with an electrostatic precipitator, to immobilize PFASs in contaminated soil, reducing their mobility and leaching, with a preferred Z potential lower than -2, and a fraction of fly ash or APCR relative to soil of at least 4%, which are readily available and cost-effective.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If expensive materials like activated carbon are used to stabilize PFASs in contaminated soil, then the effectiveness of PFAS immobilization is improved, but the cost of treatment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of PFAS immobilizationVSAvoidcost of treatment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical parameters of the fly ash by adjusting its pH level and surface charge characteristics. Fly ash with higher pH and specific surface properties shows enhanced ability to adsorb PFAS compounds, providing an effective alternative to activated carbon while reducing treatment costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive activated carbon with inexpensive fly ash, a waste byproduct from combustion processes. This substitution dramatically reduces treatment costs while maintaining effective PFAS immobilization, transforming a waste material into a valuable remediation resource

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Ease of operation

If traditional landfill disposal is used for PFAS-contaminated soil, then the immediate handling of contaminated soil is simplified, but environmental risks increase due to potential PFAS release to leachate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of soil handlingVSAvoidenvironmental risk from PFAS release
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary stabilization treatment to the contaminated soil before landfill disposal. By pre-immobilizing PFAS compounds using fly ash amendment, the soil is prepared in advance to prevent future leaching, allowing safe landfill disposal without requiring complex post-disposal treatment infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces fly ash as an intermediary substance between the PFAS-contaminated soil and the landfill environment. This intermediary material binds to PFAS compounds, preventing their direct contact with leachate and reducing environmental risk while maintaining the simplicity of landfill disposal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Quantity of substance

If soil washing methods are used to extract PFASs from contaminated soil, then the concentration of PFAS in soil is reduced, but the economic viability decreases especially for fine-grained soils

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcentration of PFAS in soilVSAvoideconomic viability of treatment
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful PFAS contamination into a beneficial adsorption opportunity. By adding fly ash to the contaminated soil, the PFAS compounds that cause harm are transformed into adsorbed complexes on the fly ash surface, effectively removing them from the soil matrix without requiring energy-intensive washing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention enables the contaminated soil to treat itself through in-situ stabilization. The fly ash amendment allows the soil to immobilize its own contaminants without requiring external washing facilities or complex extraction infrastructure, making the process economically viable for fine-grained soils

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively reduces PFAS leaching by up to 98%, is cost-efficient, and environmentally friendly, as it utilizes waste products that would otherwise need treatment, demonstrating a synergistic effect in handling two types of contaminated waste simultaneously.

Implementation Method 1

The effectiveness of the fly ash or APCR was found to be correlated to a low Z potential. Therefore, in preferred embodiments, the fly ash or APCR has a Z potential lower than 0, preferably lower than -2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic attraction: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentEP3756776B1Method and use of fly ash and air pollution control residues (APCR) for the treatment of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in contaminated soil
Publication Date: 2023.08.09 RAGN SELLS TREATMENT & DETOX AB
  • EP3756776B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3756776B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3756776B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

Fly ash or Air Pollution Control Residue, APCR, may be mixed with PFAS contaminated soil to immobilize PFAS in the soil. Tests have shown that the amount of PFAS in leachate from the mixture is reduced compared to untreated soil. At the same time the APCR is also stabilized. The resulting mixture may be deposited in a landfill.