Fly Ash Transformation Process for Hazardous Waste Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for transforming fly ash from combustion processes into raw materials are incomplete and inefficient, failing to fully remove chlorides, dioxins, PCDDs/PCDFs, ammonia, cristobalite, tridymite, and heavy metals, and struggle with the dissolution of chlorides, which affects water usage and solubilization efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A multi-step process involving mixing fly ash with water, leaching with hydrochloric acid and concentrated soda ash, followed by heavy metal stabilization, carbonation with cavitation to precipitate metalloids as carbonates, and electrolysis to produce chlorine and hydrogen for energy generation, utilizing hydrodynamic cavitators to enhance solubilization and oxidation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fly ash is treated with conventional methods (carbonation, washing, leaching, stabilization with cement), then some hazardous substances are removed, but the treatment is incomplete and chlorides reduce cementitious matrix strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of hazardous substance removalVSAvoidchloride content affecting cement strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment process is divided into multiple sequential leaching stages (first leaching reactor with HCl, second leaching reactor with NaOH) to separately target different hazardous substances. This segmentation allows complete removal of chlorides, heavy metals, and metalloids without interfering with cementitious matrix strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Chlorides are extracted from fly ash in the first leaching reactor using hydrochloric acid, separating them from the solid matrix before cement stabilization. This extraction eliminates the harmful effect of chlorides on cement strength while recovering them as soluble salts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If more water is used for leaching and washing fly ash, then hazardous substances are more effectively removed, but water consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of hazardous substance removalVSAvoidwater consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The process uses concentrated solutions (hydrochloric acid and concentrated soda ash) to increase the efficiency of hazardous substance removal per unit volume of water. This parameter change allows effective treatment with reduced water consumption compared to conventional dilute washing methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The leaching solutions containing dissolved hazardous substances are separated from the treated fly ash and can be further processed or disposed of as concentrated waste streams, improving the efficiency of water usage by focusing removal effort in controlled stages rather than extensive washing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Reliability

If multiple treatment steps are added to completely transform fly ash, then conversion to raw materials is more complete, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of fly ash transformationVSAvoidnumber of treatment steps and reactors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The same basic reactor design and separation equipment are used repeatedly across multiple treatment stages, with only the chemical reagents changing. This universality reduces overall system complexity compared to using different specialized equipment for each treatment function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The process combines multiple treatment functions (leaching, precipitation, separation) into an integrated flow where each reactor performs both chemical treatment and the subsequent separation step, reducing the number of discrete equipment items needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process achieves an integral conversion of fly ash into solid zeolitic pozzolans, heavy metals, and metalloids, removing hazardous compounds and reducing water usage while producing electrical energy, resulting in high-yield, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly raw materials.

Implementation Method 1

Leaching said first solid in a first leaching reactor with hydrochloric acid (HCl) to a pH between 0.2 and 2, preferably between 0.5 and 1.5 for the removal of heavy metals and their solubilisation in a second solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLeaching: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

Leaching said second solid in a second leaching reactor with concentrated soda ash (NaOH) for a sufficiently long time to obtain a third solution containing the metalloids and magnesium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLeaching: Solvation

Implementation Method 3

Acidifying said third solution in a carbonation reactor with gaseous carbon dioxide (CO2) using a cavitation injection system; precipitating the metalloids in the form of carbonates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCarbonation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 4

using a cavitation injection system made through the union of passive cavitators and active rotating cavitators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCavitation: Cavitation

Implementation Method 5

utilizing hydrodynamic cavitators to enhance solubilization and oxidation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrodynamic cavitation: Hydrodynamic Cavitation

Implementation Method 6

Treating said first liquid in an electrolytic cell reactor provided with electrodes to obtain gaseous chlorine on the anodic side and gaseous hydrogen on the cathodic side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Implementation Method 7

said gaseous chlorine being broken down by an oxidation process using hydrogen peroxide in a chlorine transformation reactor to form oxygen and hydrochloric acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 8

Transporting the oxygen and hydrogen produced during step f. towards the fuel cell reactor to produce electricity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel cell: Fuel Cell

Implementation Method 9

Treating said second liquid in a heavy metal stabilisation reactor with NaOH to precipitate the heavy metals as insoluble hydroxides

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Data Source

PatentEP4005995A1Process for the transformation of fly ash in raw material
Publication Date: 2022.06.01 RESILCO SRL
  • EP4005995A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4005995A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4005995A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a new process for the transformation of fly ash from combustion into raw materials, in particular an industrial process for chemically and physically modifying fly ash to obtain industrial products. The ash mentioned above is classified as hazardous waste due to its content of hazardous substances (heavy metals and metalloids), dioxins and high chloride content. The process of the present invention converts such ash into solid zeolitic pozzolans, recoverable metal salts and metalloids, while the chlorides are used to produce the chemicals needed for the process itself. The process further includes energy recovery by means of fuel cells and recovery of ammonia, water and soda ash