Flyback Controller for Dimmer-Controlled LEDs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Driving light-emitting diodes (LEDs) from a conventional dimmer control using a flyback converter often results in low power factor and requires additional components for electrical isolation, increasing complexity, size, and cost.

Innovation Solution

A flyback controller is configured to generate a switching signal that converts chopped AC voltage into an average output current, which is DC isolated and varies with dimmer control settings, without using an opto-isolator for feedback, and includes an output current monitoring circuit to maintain constant average current delivery to LEDs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a flyback converter is used to convert dimmer output to constant current for LEDs, then LED driving capability is improved, but power factor becomes low

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLED driving capabilityVSAvoidpower factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the controller monitors the primary current and adjusts the switching timing accordingly. The controller measures the current through the primary winding and uses this feedback to synchronize the switching events with the AC line voltage, enabling power factor correction while maintaining constant current output to the LEDs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameters of the flyback converter by adjusting the switching timing based on the AC line voltage phase. The controller dynamically modifies the switching instant to align with the voltage waveform, transforming the converter from a fixed-timing design to one that adapts its parameters to achieve both LED constant current operation and improved power factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If an opto-isolator with sense resistor is added for electrical isolation in the feedback path, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical isolationVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the opto-isolator and sense resistor from the feedback path. Instead of using these separate isolation components, the design achieves the necessary electrical isolation through the inherent transformer isolation and a simplified feedback approach that monitors primary current directly, removing unnecessary complexity while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the feedback function with the existing primary current sensing capability of the flyback converter. Rather than adding a separate opto-isolator-based feedback path, the design utilizes the primary current information already available in the converter circuit, combining multiple functions into the existing structure and reducing component count.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If an opto-isolator is used for feedback, then electrical isolation is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical isolationVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive opto-isolators with a simpler, more cost-effective feedback implementation using existing primary current sensing elements. By eliminating the need for costly isolation components and utilizing already-present circuit elements for feedback purposes, the design reduces manufacturing costs while maintaining the necessary electrical isolation through the transformer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves power factor correction and reduces complexity by eliminating the need for opto-isolators, while maintaining constant current delivery to LEDs, thus improving efficiency and reducing costs.

Implementation Method 1

a primary winding of a transformer in a flyback converter... into an average output current from a secondary winding of the transformer that is DC isolated from the chopped AC voltage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS8692481B2Dimmer-controlled LEDs using flyback converter with high power factor
Publication Date: 2014.04.08 ANALOG DEVICES INT UNLTD CO
  • US8692481B2 patent drawing
  • US8692481B2 patent drawing
  • US8692481B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flyback controller generates a switching signal for controlling delivery of current into a primary winding of a transformer in a flyback converter. The controller may include an output current monitoring circuit configured to generate a signal representative of an average output current in a secondary winding of the transformer based on a peak input current in the primary winding and a duty cycle of current in the secondary winding. The flyback controller may generate a switching signal that causes a chopped AC voltage from a dimmer control to be converted by the flyback converter into an average output current from a secondary winding of the transformer that is DC isolated from the chopped AC voltage and that varies as a function of the setting of the dimmer control. The flyback controller may not utilize a signal from an opto-isolator.