Flyback Converter Control Circuit Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control circuits for flyback converters either suffer from significant capacitive losses when operating in constant frequency mode or are limited to low power applications when using Quasi-Resonant control, lacking flexibility to adapt to varying power scenarios effectively.

Innovation Solution

A control device that switches a switching element between constant frequency and variable frequency modes based on detected operative conditions, using a timing signal to select the appropriate mode and detect zero current or stationary points in an auxiliary winding to optimize energy transfer and reduce losses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If constant frequency control is used, then circuit architecture is simple, but capacitive losses are significant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit architectureVSAvoidcapacitive losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit dynamically adjusts the switching frequency based on the operating mode. In CCM, it operates at a fixed frequency with simple architecture. In DCM, it transitions to variable frequency operation, synchronizing switching with zero-current detection to minimize capacitive losses. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between circuit simplicity and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the switching frequency parameter from constant to variable depending on the conduction mode. By detecting whether the converter is operating in CCM or DCM, the control circuit adjusts the frequency parameter accordingly—fixed in CCM for simplicity, variable in DCM to reduce capacitive losses by switching at optimal moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If Quasi-Resonant control is used, then capacitive losses are reduced, but the converter is limited to low power applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapacitive lossesVSAvoidpower range
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit is designed to perform multiple functions by detecting the conduction mode and adapting its operation accordingly. It can operate in both CCM (suitable for higher powers) and DCM (suitable for lower powers with reduced capacitive losses), making the converter universally applicable across a wide power range rather than being limited to specific applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically switches between CCM and DCM operation based on load conditions and power requirements. This dynamic mode switching enables the converter to adapt to varying power scenarios, resolving the limitation of QR control to only low-power applications while maintaining reduced capacitive losses through intelligent operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Volume of stationary object

If DCM is used, then magnetic component sizes are reduced, but power handling capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic component sizesVSAvoidpower handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The converter dynamically switches between DCM and CCM based on power requirements. When operating in DCM, magnetic component sizes are reduced for low-power applications. When higher power is needed, the system transitions to CCM which provides better power handling capability. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between component size and power capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The operating range is segmented into different conduction modes (CCM and DCM) that can be selected based on power requirements. This segmentation allows the system to optimize for either small component size (DCM) or high power capability (CCM) depending on the application needs, rather than being constrained to a single operating mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Power

If CCM is used, then power handling capability is improved, but magnetic component sizes increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower handling capabilityVSAvoidmagnetic component sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically selects between CCM and DCM operation based on the required power level. For high-power applications, CCM is selected to maximize power handling capability despite larger magnetic components. For lower-power applications, the system switches to DCM to minimize component size. This dynamic selection resolves the contradiction between power capability and component size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient operation across different power scenarios by minimizing capacitive losses and allowing seamless transition between Continuous Conduction Mode and Discontinuous Conduction Mode, improving electromagnetic compatibility and reducing energy irradiation intensity.

Implementation Method 1

A flyback converter includes an electric transformer, with the switching element that periodically connects a primary winding of said transformer to the input network (providing the input voltage), in such a way to modulate the energy that is transferred to a secondary winding coupled to the load

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the QR control circuit synchronizes, with a proper delay, the switching of the switching element with the instant at which the current flowing in the secondary winding reaches a null value, in such a way that the switching element is activated when a voltage at a terminal of the switching element connected to the primary winding is near zero. The latter condition is also known as Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) condition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectZero Voltage Switching:

Data Source

PatentUS10361633B2Control method and device for switching power supplies having more than one control mode
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 STMICROELECTRONICS SRL
  • US10361633B2 patent drawing
  • US10361633B2 patent drawing
  • US10361633B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated circuit includes an output terminal a first input terminal is configured to receive a signal proportional to a voltage between first and second terminals of the primary winding, and a second input terminal is configured to receive a signal proportional to a current flowing through the primary winding. A quasi-resonant (QR) circuit has a first input coupled to the first terminal, and a second input coupled to an output of an oscillator circuit. A selector circuit has a first input coupled to the output of the oscillator circuit, a second input coupled to an output of the QR circuit, and a select input. An output control circuit includes a first input coupled to the second input terminal, a second input coupled to an output of the selector circuit, and an output coupled to a control terminal of the switching transistor.