Flyback Converter Forced ZVS Timing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Flyback converters experience power losses due to switching transitions occurring with non-zero voltages across power switches, particularly in variable frequency zero voltage switching (ZVS) modes, which can lead to undesirable electromagnetic interference (EMI) and efficiency issues.

Innovation Solution

Implementing Forced Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) timing control by detecting a positive current excursion of the secondary winding current as the synchronous rectifier turn-off trigger, allowing the primary switch to be turned on with zero drain-to-source voltage and maintaining a constant frequency operation, thereby eliminating switching losses and EMI concerns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If variable frequency zero voltage switching (ZVS) is implemented by extending the synchronous rectifier conduction period, then zero voltage switching is achieved, but the switching frequency becomes variable which causes electromagnetic interference (EMI) disturbance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching lossVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from variable frequency to fixed frequency operation. The synchronous rectifier is turned off based on a fixed timing signal that maintains constant switching frequency, while still achieving ZVS through proper timing coordination between the primary switch and synchronous rectifier gate signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback by detecting the secondary current and using it to control the synchronous rectifier turn-off timing. The control circuit monitors the secondary current status and adjusts the gate signal accordingly to achieve ZVS while maintaining fixed frequency operation, resolving the contradiction between energy efficiency and EMI prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the synchronous rectifier conduction period is extended to achieve zero voltage switching, then switching efficiency is improved, but the switching frequency becomes variable which is undesirable for EMI avoidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching efficiencyVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameter from variable frequency to fixed frequency by using a timing signal generated from the fixed frequency switching signal. This maintains constant switching frequency for EMI avoidance while still achieving high switching efficiency through proper ZVS timing control of the synchronous rectifier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If zero voltage switching is implemented with extended synchronous rectifier on time, then power losses are reduced, but variable frequency operation occurs which causes EMI disturbance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower lossVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit uses feedback from secondary current detection to precisely control the synchronous rectifier turn-off timing. This feedback mechanism enables the system to achieve zero voltage switching for reduced power loss while maintaining fixed frequency operation to avoid EMI, resolving the contradiction between energy efficiency and electromagnetic interference prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The Forced ZVS timing control ensures zero voltage switching for the primary switch, improving efficiency and allowing the flyback converter to operate in fixed frequency discontinuous conduction mode, reducing power losses and electromagnetic interference.

Implementation Method 1

the extended on time Tdelay is used to allow a negative secondary current to build up on the secondary transformer winding, as indicated by current IZVS in FIG. 4. As long as the energy stored in the magnetizing inductance Lm by the negative secondary current IZVS is sufficient to discharge the primary switch parasitic capacitance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic Induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9899931B1Zero voltage switching flyback converter for primary switch turn-off transitions
Publication Date: 2018.02.20 ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR INC
  • US9899931B1 patent drawing
  • US9899931B1 patent drawing
  • US9899931B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flyback converter implements a Forced Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) timing control by detecting a positive current excursion of the secondary winding current as the synchronous rectifier turn off trigger. The synchronous rectifier switch is turned on near the end of the switching cycle or the on duration is extended to develop a current ripple on the secondary winding current. The control circuit of the flyback converter detects a positive current excursion on the secondary winding current to turn off the synchronous rectifier and to start the next switching cycle. At this point, the voltage across the primary switch has been discharged and the primary switch can be turned on with zero drain-to-source voltage. In other embodiments, zero voltage switching for the off-transition of the primary switch is realized by coupling a capacitor across the primary switch or by coupling a capacitor across the primary winding, or both.